Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
of marriage equality, we may have a double battle on our hands. There may also be an Initiative 1192 on the ballot, which serves to confuse the issue. I-1192 would change the definition of marriage in the Washington State Constitution to read "between one man and one woman". So, if both Ref. 74 and I-1192 reach the ballot, anyone who wishes to have marriage equality in Washington will have to vote Yes on R-74 and No on I-1192.
Leave it to our opposition to confuse the issue as much as is humanly possible. On a personal note: if the knuckle draggers fail to get either the referendum or the initiative on the ballot, I'm getting married on June 10th.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read