Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wisconsin

sybylla

(8,655 posts)

6. He's not ruling on Walker, he's ruling on a law passed by the full legislatur. There's a difference.

Reply to HereSince1628 (Original post)

Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:03 PM

Mar 2012

This complaint is just more whining by the GOPpies. Hell, if they're going by the True the Vote idiots, the chances the judge actually did sign the petition are slim to none.

When the judicial review commission lets Gableman and Zeigler get away with blatantly obvious financial and family conflicts, I doubt this will merit more than ten minutes consideration if it even gets that far.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Will this cause a review? The Judge in voter ID case signed Walker recall petition [View all] HereSince1628 Mar 2012 OP

Judge is citizen too. lawyerluke Mar 2012 #1

Why would that be a conflict? Ziggystrange Mar 2012 #2

It seems to me no more of a conflict than if a judge had chosen NOT to sign a recall position. mysuzuki2 Mar 2012 #3

It does not matter Homer12 Mar 2012 #4

K&R midnight Mar 2012 #5

He's not ruling on Walker, he's ruling on a law passed by the full legislatur. There's a difference. sybylla Mar 2012 #6