Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wisconsin

DreWId

(78 posts)

8. Depends

Reply to rhett o rick (Reply #5)

Sun Feb 3, 2013, 02:53 PM

Feb 2013

Depends on whether or not disclosing of said contributions is a criminal offense or just a faux pas. It also depends on whether she may be facing any conflict of interest cases were the school voucher system be brought to the Supreme Court.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wisconsin: State Supreme Court Justice Caught Taking Money From Out-of-State Voucher backers [View all] Scuba Feb 2013 OP

Why does the so called liberal news media make it so difficult to find out the party affiliation left is right Feb 2013 #1

Thanks. I edited the post to add that important fact. Scuba Feb 2013 #2

Supreme Court elections are nonpartisan. Jackpine Radical Feb 2013 #6

K&R MichiganVote Feb 2013 #3

K&R ...and add ewagner Feb 2013 #4

By majority consensus of the lower court? DreWId Feb 2013 #7

No....not that... ewagner Feb 2013 #11

Did she commit a crime? nm rhett o rick Feb 2013 #5

Depends DreWId Feb 2013 #8

It would have been nice if the article would have elaborated a little. nm rhett o rick Feb 2013 #9

Is this enough to get her removed from office? This is a conflict of interest. freshwest Feb 2013 #10