Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
210/346, or 61%; everywhere else is up in the 90 percents, even Washington which was the first apparent hotspot.
Minnesota's early case numbers bear a remarkable similarity to the Fibonacci sequence, until 16th March:
https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/situation.html
I wonder if that, combined, shows many of their cases were earlier than realised, and the testing was catching up with the situation.
210/346, or 61%; everywhere else is up in the 90 percents, even Washington which was the first apparent hotspot.
Minnesota's early case numbers bear a remarkable similarity to the Fibonacci sequence, until 16th March:
https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/situation.html
I wonder if that, combined, shows many of their cases were earlier than realised, and the testing was catching up with the situation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
