Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bad Dog

(2,044 posts)
23. It's deliberate disinformation.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 06:55 AM
Apr 2016

They're deliberately trying to make it about something else. It's not about his sex life but about his decision making on press regulation. Any government minister whose behaviour warrants the interest of Fleet Street is something the public should know about.

The sexual behaviour of a celebrity couple who have been enjoying threesomes is definitely not in the public interest, but that hasn't stopped the tabloids going to court in an attempt to overturn injunctions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, not very savoury, but I don't care so much about their personal lives... LeftishBrit Apr 2016 #1
John Whittingdale used to be my MP T_i_B Apr 2016 #2
If true, it extends way beyond his personal life into undue influence on the media. Denzil_DC Apr 2016 #3
I can't help wondering if the blackmail is already happening... LeftishBrit Apr 2016 #5
Due to his role in Media legislation. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #4
Minister John Whittingdale admits relationship with sex worker muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #6
There was asegment on this on Newsnight tonight. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #7
Well, stories like this can be handy, Denzil_DC Apr 2016 #8
for me... Ironing Man Apr 2016 #9
Same here. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #11
Newsthump: Sex worker shamed by relationship with 'politician' LeftishBrit Apr 2016 #10
He's not been behaving like an innocent man. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #12
OTOH... Ironing Man Apr 2016 #13
Erk. Denzil_DC Apr 2016 #14
I agree with everything you said. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #15
More from Byline, Denzil_DC Apr 2016 #16
One surprising thing: the photographer took the pictures to Max Clifford, after he had been charged muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #17
Dunno, it's a puzzler. Denzil_DC Apr 2016 #18
On newsnight he said that the Independent wouldn't run the story because of the Daily Mail. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #19
I'm sure we're all delighted Denzil_DC Apr 2016 #20
Exactly. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #21
There was a terrible piece Denzil_DC Apr 2016 #22
It's deliberate disinformation. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #23
Last night's "Have I Got News for You" went to town on the story. Denzil_DC Apr 2016 #25
I didn't know it's back on. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #26
It was a good 'un. Denzil_DC Apr 2016 #27
I saw most of it. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #31
If the editors' position had been from the start "not interested in single MP's sex life" muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #24
So the tabloids run this country; good to know! LeftishBrit Apr 2016 #29
Makes you want to wrap yourself in the Union Jack Bad Dog Apr 2016 #32
The plot thickens ... Denzil_DC Apr 2016 #28
Irony indeed LeftishBrit Apr 2016 #30
Clearly he's no longer considered an asset. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #33
This may also reflect the horrible rivalry Denzil_DC Apr 2016 #34
As a non dom Bad Dog Apr 2016 #35
I agree LeftishBrit Apr 2016 #36
Yes. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #37
I disagree on this... LeftishBrit Apr 2016 #38
I said it was just me. Bad Dog Apr 2016 #40
Technically, Commonwealth and Republic of Ireland citizens can be MPs muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #39
The Guardian's Media Monkey column wades in: Denzil_DC Apr 2016 #41
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Culture Secretary John Wh...»Reply #23