Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
United Kingdom
In reply to the discussion: Culture Secretary John Whittingdale Caught in Prostitution Scandal [View all]Denzil_DC
(7,288 posts)41. The Guardian's Media Monkey column wades in:
Daily Mail and Telegraph's attacks on Byline go awry
Some of the attempts to dig up dirt on Byline, the crowdfunded journalism site that first published details of John Whittingdales private life, appear to have gone slightly awry.
First there was a Daily Mail claim that campaign group Hacked Off directly funded the organisation, which had to be clarified on Wednesday morning.
And then later in the day the Telegraph quietly amended a line about Bylines backers written by Andrew Gilligan which talked about Jae-woong Lee, a South Korean billionaire who is the father of the sites founder, Seung-yoon Lee.
The problem was that, as Jae-woong Lee and Seung-yoon Lee pointed out on Twitter, they are not father and son.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/mediamonkeyblog/2016/apr/20/daily-mail-telegraph-byline-hacked-off
Some of the attempts to dig up dirt on Byline, the crowdfunded journalism site that first published details of John Whittingdales private life, appear to have gone slightly awry.
First there was a Daily Mail claim that campaign group Hacked Off directly funded the organisation, which had to be clarified on Wednesday morning.
And then later in the day the Telegraph quietly amended a line about Bylines backers written by Andrew Gilligan which talked about Jae-woong Lee, a South Korean billionaire who is the father of the sites founder, Seung-yoon Lee.
The problem was that, as Jae-woong Lee and Seung-yoon Lee pointed out on Twitter, they are not father and son.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/mediamonkeyblog/2016/apr/20/daily-mail-telegraph-byline-hacked-off
Byline has a more detailed rebuttal of the Gilligan hit-job:
Andrew Gilligan - Pants On Fire
The Telegraph has run a hatchet job on Byline Media and Hacked Off today. It is so poorly researched that it qualifies as an amateurish pack of lies - but not journalism.
It had to come: after all the hit jobs on website Byline Media and campaigning group Hacked Off last week, the Telegraph showed its hand, and its desperation, by summoning Andrew Transcription Error Gilligan to write a smear piece so amateurish in its research and construction that it has left those at both Byline and Hacked Off looking like extras in a Smash advert, rather than angrily consulting their lawyers (which may come later).
Zelo Street has asked both organisations to comment, and has been given feedback from senior and reliable sources at both. What follows exposes the sheer vacuousness and dishonesty of Andrew Gilligan - as well as the paper that publishes his work.
https://www.byline.com/column/20/article/989
The Telegraph has run a hatchet job on Byline Media and Hacked Off today. It is so poorly researched that it qualifies as an amateurish pack of lies - but not journalism.
It had to come: after all the hit jobs on website Byline Media and campaigning group Hacked Off last week, the Telegraph showed its hand, and its desperation, by summoning Andrew Transcription Error Gilligan to write a smear piece so amateurish in its research and construction that it has left those at both Byline and Hacked Off looking like extras in a Smash advert, rather than angrily consulting their lawyers (which may come later).
Zelo Street has asked both organisations to comment, and has been given feedback from senior and reliable sources at both. What follows exposes the sheer vacuousness and dishonesty of Andrew Gilligan - as well as the paper that publishes his work.
https://www.byline.com/column/20/article/989
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, not very savoury, but I don't care so much about their personal lives...
LeftishBrit
Apr 2016
#1
If true, it extends way beyond his personal life into undue influence on the media.
Denzil_DC
Apr 2016
#3
One surprising thing: the photographer took the pictures to Max Clifford, after he had been charged
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2016
#17
On newsnight he said that the Independent wouldn't run the story because of the Daily Mail.
Bad Dog
Apr 2016
#19
If the editors' position had been from the start "not interested in single MP's sex life"
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2016
#24
Technically, Commonwealth and Republic of Ireland citizens can be MPs
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2016
#39