Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stevepol

(4,234 posts)
40. Showing the Facts
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 08:09 AM
Aug 2015

You demand of the poster: "If your claim iscorrect then show the facts."

May I ask a simple question. If the inner workings of the computer (what programs are running there, whether it gives an accurate count, who programs it, who updates it or hacks it or rigs it, etc.) are completely off limits to any impartial outside entity, what facts are you talking about? It's possible to give many cases where the exit polls didn't jibe with the so-called results. In fact, nowadays nearly all elections deviate from the unadjusted exit poll numbers and nearly always in a "red" direction.

I'm sure the poster would give the "facts" that you demand IF IT WAS POSSIBLE TO GIVE THESE FACTS. The whole point of the argument is that IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO GIVE THE FACTS ABOUT ANY ELECTION. THE VOTE COUNTING ON ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES IS UNVERIFIABLE!

Can you understand that?

I write about this a lot in FLA. A stronger audit of paper ballots against machine totals is needed. TheNutcracker May 2015 #1
We should make it an issue lovelydestruction Dec 2015 #47
Long past time Vincardog May 2015 #2
Read these links! Baobab May 2016 #48
I would add that people interested should Google William Spoonamore. Dustlawyer Aug 2016 #51
The 'Hursti Hack' of the Optical Scan machines Hacking_Democracy Aug 2016 #52
Thanks for bringing this up. SusanCalvin May 2015 #3
Paper ballots, hand counted, in public, cameras rolling. Nothing less. Scuba May 2015 #4
Yes, yes, yes! kath Jun 2015 #16
Yes Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2015 #19
"Belief" is not enough. Peace Patriot May 2015 #5
Have you ever worked in Early Voting or voting on Election Day? Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #7
That has nothing to do with the vote count accuracy. n/t Wilms Jun 2015 #22
If your claim iscorrect then show the facts, I have presented my information. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #23
Nice try. Wilms Jun 2015 #24
Nice try on your part, this is appearing to be another CT. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #26
. Wilms Jun 2015 #28
. GoneFishin Jun 2015 #29
Guess I have my answer. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #31
Showing the Facts Stevepol Aug 2015 #40
I understand entirely, I need to see some facts and not conspiracy therory. Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #42
It is a FACT that voting machines are UNVERIFIABLE Stevepol Aug 2015 #43
We also found the paper ballots in Florida was not verifible, this has been proven. Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #45
In Florida the printed paper poll tapes are a public record of the election. Hacking_Democracy Aug 2016 #53
It doesn't appear paper ballots helped the DNC in 2000, in fact it cost Gore the election. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #6
Boston uses a paper ballot that you can choose to mark with a pencil--no chad issues--or merrily Jun 2015 #8
Did you know on the Diebold machines you are given a review of your ballot? Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #25
Review is irrelevant unless you have written verification. merrily Jun 2015 #27
Having dealt with pencil strokes for several years I don't find this was an accurate system of Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #33
Testimony in Congress was that it was very easy to program the software to cheat. Not that anyone merrily Jun 2015 #34
Did I say I dealt with pencil strokes on ballots? Louisiana went to electric machines as early as Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #35
The software is easy to rig. That is not even debatable. merrily Jun 2015 #36
Yes, this is why so many people, monitors, companies, grocery stores, etc use computers. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #37
Total non sequitur fail. merrily Jun 2015 #38
When you get a valid argument we can resume. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #39
Banks, grocery stores, etc. Stevepol Aug 2015 #41
What "cost Gore the election" was the US Supreme Court sketchy Jun 2015 #9
I do not engage in CT, electronic voting and counting is more accurate. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #10
Do you engage in mathematics? sketchy Jun 2015 #11
Are you saying mathematician are not capable of CT? Do you think paper ballots can not be Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #12
No, I am not saying "mathematician are not capable of CT" sketchy Jun 2015 #13
Do Democrats care enough to demand that the votes are never left alone in the hands Cal33 Jun 2015 #15
Are you serious? Hiw long have you been voting electronically or with Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #17
If there are both Dem. and Repub. people present at all times with the votes, the Cal33 Jun 2015 #20
Here's an interesting event you may enjoy reading Stevepol Aug 2015 #44
Nothing new here, the what ifs has not been proven. Apparently you do not like voting machines, I Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #46
The voting machine totals can be rigged to match the voter sign in books. Hacking_Democracy Aug 2016 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author Thinkingabout Aug 2016 #50
I've been harping on this for years, and the Democratic Party hasn't Cal33 Jun 2015 #14
I suspect that they have benefitted in some more convoluted way. Maybe it helps in their primary GoneFishin Jun 2015 #32
This is actually one of the few things that NC has gotten right. Persondem Jun 2015 #18
fair 1STWURLDVIEW Jun 2015 #21
We need a paper record verified by the voter, on hand, available for a recount. Period. Anybody who GoneFishin Jun 2015 #30
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»What does Bernie believe ...»Reply #40