Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jane123

(34 posts)
60. Read this 1st person account from a poll worker in New York.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 04:13 PM
Apr 2016


MY EXPERIENCE AS A POLL WORKER: EPIC FAIL -- OR THEFT?

I just got off my 17 hour shift as an election official in East Hampton, NY. I am from this area and went canvassing for Bernie for 4 days here. While canvassing, I found overwhelming support for Bernie in my middle class area -- nearly every house where I actually talked to voters (about 40% of the houses), almost all were for Bernie.

But today at the polls, many of those had disappeared from the voter roll book. In my own ED district, which is the district I was working in, out of 166 Democratic voters, 39 were forced to file affidavit ballots. (ONLY 2 Republican voters had to file affidavits.) That's close to 20%. Let that sink in for a moment. Many of these voters were long term registered Democrats -- some were in couples where one person was on the rolls and the other was not. Most had not moved since the last election and had voted in the most recent elections.

Hillary won by 11 votes in my ED -- not counting affidavits. THE AFFIDAVITS MUST NOT ONLY BE COUNTED, THEY MUST BE ALLOWED.

It was impossible for me, an election official, to get a straight story on whether the affidavits would be counted. The "coordinator" -- the top person at the site -- let slip that they count the affidavits "proportionately". If she is correct, that means, I assume, they take a sample of the ballots to count. Not all. If that sample is based on the proportion of official ballots cast, then I imagine it would just reproduce the first results WITHOUT the affidavits.

But it's worse than that. If the voter has been purged from the Board of Elections rolls -- like 125,000 Brooklyn voters were -- then it seems the affidavits (because no one could tell me for certain WHAT would happen to the affidavits -- are not counted. If you can't prove you are a registered Democrat, then you won't be counted, it seems. (If you received a voter card, you have some proof. But not everyone did or they may not be able to retrieve it.)

The ruling that came down from the emergency voter protection suit was no remedy. It allowed for getting a court order to vote. The nearest judge is more than an hour from here. And I was strongly discouraged from even informing voters that a court order was an option (I had to fight to be able to tell people of their right to a court order.)

Finally -- this was NOT business as usual. This was my second election. The last one I worked at, exactly ONE voter needed an affidavit ballot in my ED. Every poll worker there, at all the ED tables (there were 4) was shocked at the number of voters who were not on the rolls. Many have been working for years -- and had never seen anything remotely like this.

The whole purging and affidavit process needs to be investigated on an emergency basis BEFORE the election results are decided. Bernie's folks need to be on top of this. They need to fight for an honest election. They owe it to us who have worked so hard for them.

Francesca Rheannon
No wonder H won so 'big' RobertEarl Apr 2016 #1
bullshit. republicans are going to do this all over the country and certainot Apr 2016 #39
This scscholar Apr 2016 #76
Sanders was behind it all. Amimnoch Apr 2016 #48
Bullshit. Fantastic Anarchist Apr 2016 #54
Your side first. Amimnoch Apr 2016 #56
I did no such thing. Fantastic Anarchist Apr 2016 #57
The person I replied to DID insinuate that. Amimnoch Apr 2016 #70
I'm not interested in the person you replied to. Fantastic Anarchist Apr 2016 #79
Read this 1st person account from a poll worker in New York. jane123 Apr 2016 #60
Bookmarked for outrageousness Baobab Apr 2016 #67
Not really a joke, as much as a point. Amimnoch Apr 2016 #71
Give me some examples of outrageous things people have said about Hillary that made you feel like Baobab Apr 2016 #75
Sure. Amimnoch Apr 2016 #80
Could you say what they said, I am just finding circular - its not clear to me what they said. Baobab Apr 2016 #81
They purged "inactive" voters... the ones most likely to be motivated by Sanders... modestybl Apr 2016 #69
Were the election laws and rules changed for this primary? Amimnoch Apr 2016 #72
It's not only the rules, its what gets enforced... modestybl Apr 2016 #74
Ah! Greg Palast! Bohemianwriter Apr 2016 #2
Ain't that the sad and simple truth. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #3
Probably some of them were independents following the widespread online advice to request pnwmom Apr 2016 #4
And probably they weren't. See how that works? Raster Apr 2016 #5
ABC's exit poll said close to 20% of Dem primary voters identified themselves as independent. pnwmom Apr 2016 #6
Looks like maybe I picked the wrong excerpt to post. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #8
The poll worker has worked this before. If it was independents he would have said so. newthinking Apr 2016 #9
We know that independents were being urged to vote by provisional ballot pnwmom Apr 2016 #10
K&R Progressive dog Apr 2016 #42
That does need to be stressed. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #51
How were the poll books set up? LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #24
In NY, there are separate books by party Progressive dog Apr 2016 #44
Thank you for that info. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #50
Probably the 126,000 who were kicked off the voting roles. Stop rationalizing Election Fraud as a Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #11
They haven't determined exactly what happened, but it's possible it was connected pnwmom Apr 2016 #14
Yes we do but with the fox guarding the investigation henhouse all the evidence will be in the Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #28
What fox? Are you accusing a Democrat of being unethical, or is this a Rethug you're referring to? pnwmom Apr 2016 #29
Rose colored glasses. Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #31
That's why you're seeing red. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #32
Funny.... Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #77
Take the worst case, paranoid nightmare.. Thor_MN Apr 2016 #18
and probably some of the potential voters just left and lakeguy Apr 2016 #38
Yup, 2000 will be a choir compared to what is coming nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #7
the people responsible for these purges are scum blackspade Apr 2016 #12
Here is Francesca whole public post xloadiex Apr 2016 #13
Thank you, xloadiex. Just as I suspected. Enthusiast Apr 2016 #40
Poll Worker Mesee Apr 2016 #49
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #15
Eh? nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #20
I'm sorry, SusanCalvin, I must have been distracted. Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #22
Enjoy it while you can, Hillary Supporter. frylock Apr 2016 #16
Huh? Are you calling me a Hillary supporter? nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #21
No. That was directed to supporters of Mrs Clinton who are laughing this off. frylock Apr 2016 #23
Enjoy what? Darb Apr 2016 #62
Enjoy the election fraud. frylock Apr 2016 #63
Why the fuck would we enjoy election fraud? Darb Apr 2016 #64
I'm basing that on the rather glib attitude that Hillary Supporter has taken toward it. frylock Apr 2016 #68
Who says a "certain candidate" isn't affected? Darb Apr 2016 #82
"uncovering an unjustified ethnic cleansing of voter rolls from Ohio to Florida to Texas" pat_k Apr 2016 #17
The last election your worked.... Historic NY Apr 2016 #19
Our elections can be summed up easily: "The one that cheats the most wins." Feeling the Bern Apr 2016 #25
Yawn. Lose the fedora, Greg. It looks stupid on you. stopbush Apr 2016 #26
Typical AlbertCat Apr 2016 #30
Kinda like that yellow Star Trek outfit??? raindaddy Apr 2016 #37
Same thing happened in our Iowa Caucuses CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #27
Amen and AMEN! ReRe Apr 2016 #33
But it is ok if Kathleen Harris Schultz cheats INdemo Apr 2016 #34
I was always under the impression CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #35
Hey, CoffeeCat. It's shocking to find out just how wrong we were. Enthusiast Apr 2016 #41
This is why we have to keep donating/fighting CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #43
Right you are! Enthusiast Apr 2016 #45
There has never been a Democratic INdemo Apr 2016 #47
This election has certainly been an eye-opener nxylas Apr 2016 #58
Lately I have been reminded a lot of the "both parties are the same" meme. I always rejected it. thereismore Apr 2016 #65
Do you know what your states electioneering laws are? Loki Apr 2016 #36
K&R jwirr Apr 2016 #53
Our system needs a massive overhaul - by Sept. 1 at latest Mopar151 Apr 2016 #46
^THIS^ SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #78
The big difference between Tuesday and November is that Tuesday was a PRIMARY day.... George II Apr 2016 #52
PukeBaggers and Turd Wayers... SoapBox Apr 2016 #55
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman Investigating Primary Voting Irregularities jane123 Apr 2016 #59
Bernie lost big, that's all there is to it. The_Casual_Observer Apr 2016 #61
Doubtful. OwlinAZ Apr 2016 #66
You call this civilized? The_Casual_Observer Apr 2016 #73
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»Greg Palast: New York vo...»Reply #60