Barack Obama

ellisonz

(27,776 posts)

8. So are we just going to ban anybody that posts something we don't like without warning?

Wed Dec 7, 2011, 11:43 PM

Dec 2011

Are we not going to engage in debate? I don't think that's a very productive approach. I think we'll lose way more hearts and minds through this approach than through a more tolerant one. I do not believe this is what we need to be doing as a group in DU heading into the 2012 election. If I'm a vegetarian should I stay out of Cooking and Baking if I don't like recipes involving meat? If I'm an astronomer do I have no business posting in astrology? I don't want to be exclusive, I want to be exclusive. So long as it's not disruptive, dissent should be tolerated; not all dissent is disruptive. It's only disruptive if you let it be disruptive.

I'm saying this as someone who is very public about his support for the President.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Proposal for Temporary Guidelines [View all] ellisonz Dec 2011 OP

I like the way the old groups work. JTFrog Dec 2011 #1

Thank you. This is our safe haven. Says so right at the top. Nt DevonRex Dec 2011 #2

Hosts are here to address what juries cannot. Perhaps DevonRex Dec 2011 #3

Correct. ellisonz Dec 2011 #5

There is no one on this earth that agrees with the president on all issues Number23 Dec 2011 #6

So are we just going to ban anybody that posts something we don't like without warning? ellisonz Dec 2011 #8

As I said Number23 Dec 2011 #10

And as I've said ellisonz Dec 2011 #11

It was explained to you why folks stopped posting in the BOG Number23 Dec 2011 #13

I remember NanceGreggs, she was a smart woman and a great writer. ellisonz Dec 2011 #14

You obviously don't know the history here. DevonRex Dec 2011 #7

Well this is my opinion and it reflects a lot of time on DU. ellisonz Dec 2011 #9

I don't think an abstract list of rules is necessary grantcart Dec 2011 #4

And I've been removed as host for having a different opinion... ellisonz Dec 2011 #12

I am lost why you would think that the BOG and the GDP would be interchangeable, they serve entirely grantcart Dec 2011 #17

My reasoning ellisonz Dec 2011 #18

As it should be. JTFrog Dec 2011 #31

The BOG is a safe haven and should remain so... SidDithers Dec 2011 #15

Well then we're going to need GDP back. ellisonz Dec 2011 #16

Yes, if the BOG group isn't going to be a good replacement for GD-P then ... Tx4obama Dec 2011 #19

I've created a petition. ellisonz Dec 2011 #20

Civil disagreements are fine, vigorous arguments are fine, drawn out all out fights are fine, grantcart Dec 2011 #21

I felt the old BOG had become irrelevant. Also, we posted within 3 mins of eachother. ellisonz Dec 2011 #22

I stopped posting in BOG because a group of folks organized in an outside forum to harass BOGgers by grantcart Dec 2011 #27

No worries braddah. ellisonz Dec 2011 #28

I think that the confusion came from the fact ... Tx4obama Dec 2011 #23

Did people not know our mission statement before volunteering DevonRex Dec 2011 #24

Yes, I did read your mission statement when I first came to this group Tx4obama Dec 2011 #25

That is exactly what it means pipoman Dec 2011 #30

This forum is a safe haven. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #32

A bit of a repeat below, but since this group is specifically called a safe haven Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #35

Here's is what Skinner said ... Tx4obama Dec 2011 #26

Here is what EarlG said ... JTFrog Dec 2011 #36

Tx do you wish to host this group as the purpose is written? DevonRex Dec 2011 #38

After reading through the thread, I think that some people boston bean Dec 2011 #29

This isn't GDP. This is the BOG. The mission DevonRex Dec 2011 #37

I think most people who post on the BOG are sufrommich Dec 2011 #33

^^this. n/t JTFrog Dec 2011 #34