Barack Obama
In reply to the discussion: Proposal for Temporary Guidelines [View all]ellisonz
(27,776 posts)I'd bet her point was that you ought to engage your political opponents on a reasonable level. We now have that opportunity.
All I'm suggesting is a tolerance of civil disagreement, otherwise the odds are it's going to fade anyways. Getting rid of GDP was a big mistake in this regard. It's alright, clearly the pro-hardline partisan and pro-softline partisan stakes have been drawn.
I won't be contributing to a forum where I know I'm going to get no result but short agreement. That is boring and not democratic. All I'm really calling for is some system for hosting rules to be enforced and for them to be somewhat flexible. I'm not advocating letting sheer ignorance reign, but without that it is simply arbitrary in a sense.
If GDP is so bad, you'd think more people would be posting in the BOG. But they don't, because for all it's problems GDP works pretty well.