Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(10,900 posts)
9. Oh, I remember that -- the Republicans were EXPLICIT in saying that particular tax cut
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 01:39 PM
Jan 2016

had to be "paid for" (by tax increases elsewhere or spending cuts). Whereas all the many other kinds of tax cuts which included tax cuts for the top (and going mainly to the top) didn't have to be "paid for" because they already paid for themselves, by stimulating the job creators to get out of bed earlier and creating yet more jobs or somesuch, thus bringing in more tax revenue from all the additional new job holders blah blah.

By the way, one troll, no longer part of the DU community, tried to make it sound like -- in the context of Obama letting some Bush tax cuts expire -- that the 2% payroll tax holiday was one of those. But actually the 2% payroll tax holiday was begun by Obama (and Congress) and ended by them 2 years later. (And I know he knew that because we had a similar interchange about this some time before). Similarly for the 2-year Making Work Pay stimulus measure that preceded it and targeted those in the lower- and middle- income.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Barack Obama»Krugman: Obama rolled bac...»Reply #9