Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

LAS14

(15,451 posts)

4. I don't think there's a contract thing.

Reply to LAS14 (Original post)

Sat Apr 16, 2016, 08:39 PM

Apr 2016

Early on I saw a story that seemed pretty credible. The contract included transcripts that were her sole property. It's a decision on her part. Like the Mother Jones author, I'm completely confident that there's nothing worse than saying some nice things about employers doing some good things.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This expresses my opinion about "the transcripts." [View all] LAS14 Apr 2016 OP

I suspect that she has a contractual obligation TexasTowelie Apr 2016 #1

Yup. n/t OhZone Apr 2016 #2

Not only that, but she could face an expensive breach of contract lawsuit. Not something you BlueCaliDem Apr 2016 #3

I don't think there's a contract thing. LAS14 Apr 2016 #4

Assuming there's no contractual impediment, I wish she had released them long ago DavidDvorkin Apr 2016 #5

I think the people that are voting for her don't care. Her Sister Apr 2016 #6

Look at it this way; fleabiscuit Apr 2016 #7

'They' don't care what's on the transcripts. yallerdawg Apr 2016 #8

I know what I would have done. creon Apr 2016 #9

Frankly, I don't think she owes anyone anything question everything Apr 2016 #10

Everyone who wants the transcripts jrandom421 Apr 2016 #11