Hillary Clinton
In reply to the discussion: I thought this was Democratic Underground. [View all]HillareeeHillaraah
(685 posts)...hope I'm not reopening a wound this a.m. But I felt compelled to add my voice in solidarity.
I've been a reader here for years and only recently got into the mix by posting some thoughts. It is startling to see how camp sanders goes from zero to outrage in a matter of a post or two. The other day I found myself tearing up over just how vitriolic Sanders' side has become. Seems it's gotten worse as he's getting closer to losing.
But I've been reminded while reading through some calming words of those whose posts are in the thousands that MANY are here to stir up the animosity between democrats. Professional posters who will just keep poking until civil discourse is shut down and we all hate each other and hopefully won't vote at all...
When I remember that's their goal, I do my best to take that power away from them. I disengage, I refrain from snarking back (hard to do!), I give them as little ammunition as possible. For me, that technique helps.
I also try to remember that no amount of logic or facts or appeal for basic human empathy will change minds around here any more.
It's gone past silly season into are-you-freaking-kidding-me season. Case in point, yesterday I alerted on a post that was saying in their cleverest way that Trumad was schtuping a Great Dane. Not even slurs of beastiality against a fellow DUer gets hidden if it's Camp Sanders doing the slurring.
On Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:43 PM you sent an alert on the following post:
hey Trumad, did you catch that one guy?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7761883
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
YOUR COMMENTS
"Balls deep in his neighbors Great Dane?" Are you kidding me? Please tell me this site hasn't gotten that bad...are we really down to accusing folks of beastiality in the name of political discourse? And not even a protective sarcasm tag....please hide this!
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:54 PM, and voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Not hiding for "balls deep in a Great Dane," though that is pretty revolting. Hiding for the content of the entire post, which is piss-poor writing of a sophomoric attempt to insult. Not clever, not necessary.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: As far as I can decipher, this appears to be a rude and insulting post, nested inside a generally insulting thread. So I am guessing it is appropriate to hide.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Just mad random riffery comparing the worst of GD with FR People need to develop a thicker hide Unless it is directed at a DUer as an ad hominem attack it's just nutty prose poetry
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you.
I'm so sorry they put you through that experience last night. They didn't deserve to know your pain as they saw it as something to mock. Hang on til Tuesday. That's my mantra these days. And again, hope this hasn't caused yesterday's anger to resurface. Peace.