Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
In reply to the discussion: Awww ... hidden! :-P (But it was a close one!) [View all]2naSalit
(103,059 posts)67. Just served on a jury for this one..
On Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:37 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
In my opinion, those who defend it, or cheer it, can be described in the same way.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1768222
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
The alert is do to threat she posted towards jury members -that is out line and against community standards
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:56 AM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The threat to the jury ("REMEMBER: Skinner is watching..."
is definitely out of line. Changed my mind. Otherwise, I would have let the post stand.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The "note to jury" is a threat to other DUers. Get rid of the post.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh Puhleeeze! This alert is disruptive, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, and inappropriate. SMH
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Yep, you won me over Alerter. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the post, and my initial impression was to leave it. But you're right. That warning/threat is over the top.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
In my opinion, those who defend it, or cheer it, can be described in the same way.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1768222
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
The alert is do to threat she posted towards jury members -that is out line and against community standards
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:56 AM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The threat to the jury ("REMEMBER: Skinner is watching..."
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The "note to jury" is a threat to other DUers. Get rid of the post.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh Puhleeeze! This alert is disruptive, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, and inappropriate. SMH
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Yep, you won me over Alerter. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the post, and my initial impression was to leave it. But you're right. That warning/threat is over the top.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
I was #6. Edited to correct!! Sorry Jackie, I was #6 NOT #7!!!
Methinks you are being alert stalked.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Despite their claims to the contrary, the Bernie fans don't like hearing the truth.
Buzz Clik
Apr 2016
#1
Hidden posts do generate "curiosity" and everybody looks! And, we don't get enforced time
Cha
Apr 2016
#8
You know damn well that EVERY person that happens upon it will click on "Show post". LOL!
Surya Gayatri
Apr 2016
#46
This is exactly why Skinner suspended the "vacations" associated with accumulated hides.
Buzz Clik
Apr 2016
#53
He's also (quietly) REVOKING JURY PRIVILEGES for those who make bogus alerts, and...
NurseJackie
Apr 2016
#54
Over the past week, I've had several Berners mention my transparency page with a dramatic gasp.
Buzz Clik
Apr 2016
#58
Alert-stalking is still a "thing" ... I guess it's still entertaining. But ...
NurseJackie
Apr 2016
#72
Thanks for the reminder. Done. (I'd forgotten that Skinner said he would REVOKE JURY PRIVELEGES.)
NurseJackie
Apr 2016
#13
So there's no photo only BS, and an anonymous source saying there was a meeting with the Pope..
Cha
Apr 2016
#12
HH, that's such a good idea. Why don't you copy and paste and re-post under your user name?
Surya Gayatri
Apr 2016
#47
And he even carried his own luggage! There was a photographer conveniently positioned
Tanuki
Apr 2016
#27
Agree. The trip in itself is irrelevant. It's the deception and manipulation that are at issue.
Surya Gayatri
Apr 2016
#49
Meanwhile, the Corporate Media is going with BS's BS and puts the headline, "Sanders Meets Pope"
Liberal_Stalwart71
Apr 2016
#26
Jeezus, they've become totally unhinged about this whole fabricated non-event.
Surya Gayatri
Apr 2016
#35
I suspect that there's more "insider" information that will eventually come out ...
NurseJackie
Apr 2016
#38
Old habits die hard ... even if it's no longer an effective way to get Hillary supporters ...
NurseJackie
Apr 2016
#66
Don't worry! The irony of the whole thing has certainly made it out to the public.
anotherproletariat
Apr 2016
#70