Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
In reply to the discussion: This is DU. This is DU on Hillary. Any questions? [View all]OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)3. Speaking of hypocrisy,
is it acceptable to you to have Hillary Clinton follow her predecessor, Condi Rice, in having diplomats spy?
Hillary Gets Wiki-Served
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/hillary_gets_wiki-served_20101130?ln
Hillary Clinton should cut out the whining about what the Obama administration derides as stolen cables and confront the unpleasant truths they reveal about the contradictions of U.S. foreign policy and her own troubling performance. As with the earlier batch of WikiLeaks, in this latest release the corruption of our partners in Iraq and Afghanistan stands in full relief, and the net effect of nearly a decade of warfare is recognized as a strengthening of Irans influence throughout the region.
~snip~
Instead of disparaging the motives of the leakers, Hillary Clinton should offer a forthright explanation of why she continued the practice of Condoleezza Rice, her predecessor as secretary of state, of using American diplomats to spy on their colleagues working at the United Nations. Why did she issue a specific directive ordering U.S. diplomats to collect biometric information on U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and many of his colleagues?
As the respected British newspaper The Guardian, which obtained the WikiLeaks cables, said in summarizing the matter: A classified directive which appears to blur the line between diplomacy and spying was issued to US diplomats under Hillary Clintons name in July 2009, demanding forensic technical details about the communications system used by top UN officials, including passwords and personal encryption keys used in private and commercial networks for official communications.
The Guardian pointed out that the Clinton directive violates the language of the original U.N. convention, which reads: The premises of the United Nations shall be inviolable. The spying effort derived from concern that U.N. rapporteurs might unearth embarrassing details about the U.S. treatment of prisoners in Guantánamo as well as in Iraq and Afghanistan. One of the directives demanded biographic and biometric information on Dr. Margaret Chan, the director of the World Health Organization, as well as details of her personality and management style. Maybe shes hiding bin Laden in her U.N. office.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/hillary_gets_wiki-served_20101130?ln
Hillary Clinton should cut out the whining about what the Obama administration derides as stolen cables and confront the unpleasant truths they reveal about the contradictions of U.S. foreign policy and her own troubling performance. As with the earlier batch of WikiLeaks, in this latest release the corruption of our partners in Iraq and Afghanistan stands in full relief, and the net effect of nearly a decade of warfare is recognized as a strengthening of Irans influence throughout the region.
~snip~
Instead of disparaging the motives of the leakers, Hillary Clinton should offer a forthright explanation of why she continued the practice of Condoleezza Rice, her predecessor as secretary of state, of using American diplomats to spy on their colleagues working at the United Nations. Why did she issue a specific directive ordering U.S. diplomats to collect biometric information on U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and many of his colleagues?
As the respected British newspaper The Guardian, which obtained the WikiLeaks cables, said in summarizing the matter: A classified directive which appears to blur the line between diplomacy and spying was issued to US diplomats under Hillary Clintons name in July 2009, demanding forensic technical details about the communications system used by top UN officials, including passwords and personal encryption keys used in private and commercial networks for official communications.
The Guardian pointed out that the Clinton directive violates the language of the original U.N. convention, which reads: The premises of the United Nations shall be inviolable. The spying effort derived from concern that U.N. rapporteurs might unearth embarrassing details about the U.S. treatment of prisoners in Guantánamo as well as in Iraq and Afghanistan. One of the directives demanded biographic and biometric information on Dr. Margaret Chan, the director of the World Health Organization, as well as details of her personality and management style. Maybe shes hiding bin Laden in her U.N. office.
US diplomats spied on UN leadership
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/nov/28/us-embassy-cables-spying-un
A classified directive which appears to blur the line between diplomacy and spying was issued to US diplomats under Hillary Clinton's name in July 2009, demanding forensic technical details about the communications systems used by top UN officials, including passwords and personal encryption keys used in private and commercial networks for official communications.
It called for detailed biometric information "on key UN officials, to include undersecretaries, heads of specialised agencies and their chief advisers, top SYG [secretary general] aides, heads of peace operations and political field missions, including force commanders" as well as intelligence on Ban's "management and decision-making style and his influence on the secretariat". A parallel intelligence directive sent to diplomats in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi said biometric data included DNA, fingerprints and iris scans.
Washington also wanted credit card numbers, email addresses, phone, fax and pager numbers and even frequent-flyer account numbers for UN figures and "biographic and biometric information on UN Security Council permanent representatives".
~snip~
The UN has previously asserted that bugging the secretary general is illegal, citing the 1946 UN convention on privileges and immunities which states: "The premises of the United Nations shall be inviolable. The property and assets of the United Nations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, requisition, confiscation, expropriation and any other form of interference, whether by executive, administrative, judicial or legislative action".
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/nov/28/us-embassy-cables-spying-un
A classified directive which appears to blur the line between diplomacy and spying was issued to US diplomats under Hillary Clinton's name in July 2009, demanding forensic technical details about the communications systems used by top UN officials, including passwords and personal encryption keys used in private and commercial networks for official communications.
It called for detailed biometric information "on key UN officials, to include undersecretaries, heads of specialised agencies and their chief advisers, top SYG [secretary general] aides, heads of peace operations and political field missions, including force commanders" as well as intelligence on Ban's "management and decision-making style and his influence on the secretariat". A parallel intelligence directive sent to diplomats in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi said biometric data included DNA, fingerprints and iris scans.
Washington also wanted credit card numbers, email addresses, phone, fax and pager numbers and even frequent-flyer account numbers for UN figures and "biographic and biometric information on UN Security Council permanent representatives".
~snip~
The UN has previously asserted that bugging the secretary general is illegal, citing the 1946 UN convention on privileges and immunities which states: "The premises of the United Nations shall be inviolable. The property and assets of the United Nations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, requisition, confiscation, expropriation and any other form of interference, whether by executive, administrative, judicial or legislative action".
Factbox: Main revelations of WikiLeaks diplomatic cables
http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/30/us-wikileaks-details-idUSTRE6AT1I720101130?pageNumber=3
ARGENTINA
-- U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton questioned the mental health of Argentina's President Cristina Fernandez, asking U.S. diplomats to investigate whether she was on medication.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/30/us-wikileaks-details-idUSTRE6AT1I720101130?pageNumber=3
ARGENTINA
-- U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton questioned the mental health of Argentina's President Cristina Fernandez, asking U.S. diplomats to investigate whether she was on medication.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Authoritarian followers see those who question their idols as attacking enemies. nt
OnyxCollie
Jul 2015
#1
Clinton's directive was revealed in the secret cables Chelsea Manning released to WikiLeaks.
OnyxCollie
Jul 2015
#5
So if Hillary wins, Bernie loses (praying that doesnt happen) and when Bernie then shows
randys1
Jul 2015
#101
And i just saw an op that is trying to make o'malley the new third way boogeyman.
hrmjustin
Jul 2015
#19
For those here who it is all about taking Hillary down i have a hard time believing
hrmjustin
Jul 2015
#65
The thing that pisses me off is - when they do that, all they're doing is giving ammo to the enemy.
calimary
Jul 2015
#76
Thdy better get used to criticism because if he wins the nomination he will get a lot of it.
hrmjustin
Jul 2015
#33
How is this criticism of Sanders? It's obviously critical of fellow Democrats.
mountain grammy
Jul 2015
#41
Yes, like the crawl saying 'Obama Bin Laden dead! Obamacare struck down by USSC!'
freshwest
Jul 2015
#98
The illustration and its over generalization pretty much exhibits what it decries....
marble falls
Jul 2015
#35
It looks like the hypocrisy of some of the posters on DU to me.. I've seen it.. it's not a secret
Cha
Jul 2015
#85
FYI TO ALL POSTING IN HERE THIS IS THE HRC ROOM AND THIS ROOM IS FOR SUPPORTERS.
hrmjustin
Jul 2015
#40
Nah, the OP is pointing out the truth and Bernie supporters can't handle it.. that's what's going..
Cha
Jul 2015
#83
The "Whore Press" has been America's Enemy #1 since I got into politics in 1999.. and has only
Cha
Jul 2015
#90
Excellent, and I see that now, after she has agreed to do the interview tomorrow night....
George II
Jul 2015
#104