Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

IamMab

(1,359 posts)
12. Only NY had me worried, and only because of Michigan. With that past, I'm ignoring anything about
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 02:29 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie Sanders, because his campaign is over already, whether he's still running or not.

I lived through 2008's primary on the losing side, so I know what it's like. It's just too soon to expect the supporters to come around, especially with all the Revolution Media employees hidden among them. I read an article once about ending a campaign, and how for someone who lost, it's almost like the death of a person close to you. We joke, but there really are stages of grief after a dedicated campaign that is unsuccessful.

Just let them work through it, even the anger. Our candidate will become our nominee, so we've got nothing to fret about.

"Win with grace, lose without excuse."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Right. It's a little bit of red meat for the Bernie faithful griffi94 Apr 2016 #1
Is that true? I hadn't heard that one lol Bluerome Apr 2016 #3
I saw it another of the threads griffi94 Apr 2016 #8
After Tuesday any real negativity will Bluerome Apr 2016 #10
Yes it will griffi94 Apr 2016 #15
I liked Bernie a lot, and still do, but Bluerome Apr 2016 #19
He started out great griffi94 Apr 2016 #22
Ditto on that Bluerome Apr 2016 #24
Well, one difference between then and now was that Hillary stopbush Apr 2016 #2
I agree with a lot of what you say there Bluerome Apr 2016 #6
Judging by Clinton's outreach in her speeches this week, she's showing respect. displacedtexan Apr 2016 #4
She did hit him a little, and I think that's why he went negative again Bluerome Apr 2016 #9
She hit him with his inability to explain... Blanks Apr 2016 #28
She hit him on the gun issue again Bluerome Apr 2016 #29
It's step one. It is an admission that he will support her and that he knows he's lost. Squinch Apr 2016 #5
I agree, it sounds like a concession Bluerome Apr 2016 #7
Now she offers something to him so he can save face and his followers can tell themselves Squinch Apr 2016 #11
He does seem to have a temper, but hopefully Bluerome Apr 2016 #14
I am prepared for the worst. But that is a very profound statement you made! Squinch Apr 2016 #25
The line is something I've heard before, and Bluerome Apr 2016 #26
I do too. And it has been true with me as well. Squinch Apr 2016 #27
Only NY had me worried, and only because of Michigan. With that past, I'm ignoring anything about IamMab Apr 2016 #12
Spot on Bluerome Apr 2016 #16
I think back to 2004 when Kerry "earned" the support of many Deaniacs... Kaleva Apr 2016 #13
And Bush was a moderate, trump is polarizing Bluerome Apr 2016 #20
Very measured analysis. Thanks. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #17
Any time! Bluerome Apr 2016 #21
I don't know. athena Apr 2016 #18
The "unqualified" speech was probably his undoing Bluerome Apr 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»A little perspective on B...»Reply #12