She sounds as difficult to work with as her husband is in the Senate. In Jane's case, though, she is also abusive and creates an intimidating work environment. No wonder she can smear Hillary Clinton while smiling sweetly in media interviews. She's had lots of practice.
Since Jane is the "senior adviser" of Bernie's campaign, his closest confidant, and the one that handles the taxes and winds up with her children (all grown and married now) and grandchildren flying all over the country (and once to Rome) I see a controlling person in her. She may well be the one pushing Sanders onward.
Also her system of "spying" on others, while President of Burlington College, makes me think that she would have been at the top end of that data theft of Hillary Clinton sensitive campaign data. The staffers would have been reporting to her. Ditto for many of the other dirty tricks such as impersonating union workers and claiming false endorsements, but her vengeful streak outlined in the article, may also be responsible for the way the campaign negatively went after progressive groups like Planned Parenthood after they endorsed Clinton (many other examples not used here).
Watch out for Jane.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read