Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

Treant

(1,968 posts)

8. Later Primaries, really?

Reply to Her Sister (Reply #1)

Wed May 4, 2016, 09:50 AM

May 2016

Good, that means NY, PA, and MD count even more than before, and my vote in the Acela primaries far outweighs anything that happened in Washington state!

/snark

No, really, let's cheapen the votes and voters in early states, some of which happen to be swing states and that you'd need in the general election. Yeah, that'll work out well.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

For Sanders campaign, Indiana offers good news and bad ~ Rachel Maddow Blog (HRC BLOG) [View all] Her Sister May 2016 OP

Sanders hopes to prioritize later primaries over earlier ones ~ Another entry in Rachel Maddow Blog Her Sister May 2016 #1

Wow! Beating a woman who is no longer fighting back is a game-changer! pandr32 May 2016 #7

Later Primaries, really? Treant May 2016 #8

Think Rachel Maddow not buying Her Sister May 2016 #2

It's Steve Benen.. an awesome political analyst! I love reading Benen.. Mahalo, HS! Cha May 2016 #3

K&R! DemonGoddess May 2016 #4

How many Sanders rules are there now? SharonClark May 2016 #5

If Sanders won each of the remaining primaries & caucuses by 30 pts each he’d still come up short! NurseJackie May 2016 #6