Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
In reply to the discussion: I saw Jane Sanders on tv this morning and I had a bit of an epiphany. [View all]Fla Dem
(27,403 posts)36. Just this excerpt alone say alot about her :
One of the greatest ironies of Jane's candidacy for college president is in fact that she has personally benefited from all of the problems that she and Greene visited on the community. It must be remembered that Jane was the chair of the presidential search committee that chose Greene. It is her name that you will find on the contract with Greene, a contract that contained a corporate style "golden" parachute which required the school to pay him big bucks in order to buy out his contract after he resigned. Sanders was the president of the board during Greene's entire tenure and was the power behind Greene during that period. Had she been democratically oriented the problem with Greene would have been solved the day he walked in the door. Without her support he could not have acted autocratically, unilaterally, and in a retaliatory manner. Jane, as board president, was directly involved in:
-Corrupting existing democratic processes at the college and acting as the primary apologist for the autocratic policies and practices of Richard Greene
-Orchestrating the formal approval of a budget (1996-7) that eliminated essential services, was politically retaliatory in nature, and excessively costly in administrative overhead
-Ensuring approval at the board level of what amounted to a faculty purge -- the termination of 16 employees in 1996
-Suppressing criticism and stifling dissent
-Enabling Greene to render existing governance committees ineffective by rescinding the decision-making authority that had been delegated to legitimate standing committees and depriving them of necessary information
-Stonewalling proposals for the design and implementation of progressive organizational development processes, including a performance appraisal process for the president, climate analysis of the college, and strategic planning
-Suppressing the open discussion of proposals for progressive structural change in the college's governance processes
-Creating an environment where an inordinate number of talented and committed staff felt compelled to resign
-Stalling the efforts toward faculty/staff unionization
-Corrupting existing democratic processes at the college and acting as the primary apologist for the autocratic policies and practices of Richard Greene
-Orchestrating the formal approval of a budget (1996-7) that eliminated essential services, was politically retaliatory in nature, and excessively costly in administrative overhead
-Ensuring approval at the board level of what amounted to a faculty purge -- the termination of 16 employees in 1996
-Suppressing criticism and stifling dissent
-Enabling Greene to render existing governance committees ineffective by rescinding the decision-making authority that had been delegated to legitimate standing committees and depriving them of necessary information
-Stonewalling proposals for the design and implementation of progressive organizational development processes, including a performance appraisal process for the president, climate analysis of the college, and strategic planning
-Suppressing the open discussion of proposals for progressive structural change in the college's governance processes
-Creating an environment where an inordinate number of talented and committed staff felt compelled to resign
-Stalling the efforts toward faculty/staff unionization
I added the bold. Great progressive, stifling unionization.
And of course we have her disastrous tenure (2004 - 2011) as Burlington College President.
http://vtdigger.org/2011/09/27/jane-sanders-resigns-presidency-of-burlington-college-reaches-settlement/
Bernie and Jane should be thanking their lucky stars he's not going to be the nominee. This is just the tip of the iceberg from which the RW smear campaign would smear them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I saw Jane Sanders on tv this morning and I had a bit of an epiphany. [View all]
redstatebluegirl
May 2016
OP
yes, thanks for bringing that evaluation of Jane to light. I hadn't seen it.
KittyWampus
May 2016
#29
I have never NOT voted for the nominee and I will hold my nose and do it this time to keep Trump
redstatebluegirl
May 2016
#9
I understand I am getting punchy with all the Bernie people who come at us all the time:-)
redstatebluegirl
May 2016
#13
She just exposes her venomous jealousy.. it's says everything about her and nothing
Cha
May 2016
#20
Eleanor Roosevelt didn't have showy looks, but she was one of the best First Ladies ever.
LisaM
May 2016
#32
We are so fortunate, livetohike, that it's never going to happen in a million years.. longer. NEVER>
Cha
May 2016
#57
Jane is clearly enjoying all of the attention and power that has come their way.
anotherproletariat
May 2016
#42