Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
27. EVERYONE reading this thread needs to go to that thread and alert on that post ANYWAY.
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 11:47 AM
Jul 2015

You'll get back the "This thread was already alerted on" notice, but the admins see EVERY SINGLE ALERT post--if enough of us tell them what they think about this poster--whose profile shows us a pattern of activity limited to election season, apparently--maybe they'll do something about this.

I'd hope they would also look at the four posters who declined to hide that obvious dogwhistle, and couldn't even bother to comment. It won't make any difference, but if they have a pattern of being disruptive, that might resonate and be a useful data point down the line.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That is a disgrace ann--- Jul 2015 #1
It lets you know what kind of people you're dealing with Renew Deal Jul 2015 #2
Notice the 4 cowards who voted to leave it didn't sufrommich Jul 2015 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author irisblue Jul 2015 #50
Yup.. I noticed Sheepshank Jul 2015 #62
I was one of the three... Adrahil Jul 2015 #63
EVERYONE reading this thread needs to go to that thread and alert on that post ANYWAY. MADem Jul 2015 #27
Good advice and done. nt sufrommich Jul 2015 #32
I sent another alert. Control-Z Jul 2015 #33
Works for me!! And anyone in this group who has decided that they don't want to participate MADem Jul 2015 #34
done and thanks for the link. riversedge Jul 2015 #39
Done mcar Jul 2015 #44
done irisblue Jul 2015 #51
Done - "You are alerting on a post that has already been alerted on." Surya Gayatri Jul 2015 #57
+1 Jamaal510 Jul 2015 #61
WTF Iliyah Jul 2015 #4
This comment passed a jury. nt sufrommich Jul 2015 #5
Of course it did, feel the hate continues. Iliyah Jul 2015 #8
The poster is an outlier, but what is disturbing is that jury didn't vote to still_one Jul 2015 #6
That's what I was thinking.. it didn't get a hide from 4 on the jury but in the thread.. Cha Jul 2015 #10
Very surprising jury results indeed Auggie Jul 2015 #11
The poster likes to KICK stuff.... MADem Jul 2015 #35
yes, glad to see some Bernie supporters condemning that post. riversedge Jul 2015 #41
Reaching low, I always think when someone resorts to calling names they have lost the argument Thinkingabout Jul 2015 #7
Sorry to step into your group MuseRider Jul 2015 #9
I do hope Skinner looks into it,judging from the sufrommich Jul 2015 #13
Not hard to be kind MuseRider Jul 2015 #14
I agree with you completely. You are a credit to sufrommich Jul 2015 #16
Thank you. George II Jul 2015 #22
I'm afraid that isn't the case. He is affecting ARDENT Sanders support. MADem Jul 2015 #36
And sometimes I can be an asshole. MuseRider Jul 2015 #46
Look-- I was just responding to your comment about the guy. You said MADem Jul 2015 #47
They need to be banned. And those in the jury who chose to leave it should be banned. onehandle Jul 2015 #12
This one caught the bottom of my shoe. LuvLoogie Jul 2015 #15
I'm so sorry for your hide. That sucks. sufrommich Jul 2015 #18
You took one for the team!! Thank you!!! nt MADem Jul 2015 #48
you did right there irisblue Jul 2015 #55
Ya took one for the team, LuvLoogie! Cha Jul 2015 #58
This does confirm my appraisal of DU's judges (as a whole) rock Jul 2015 #17
"There is apparently no bottom to be reached by some Clinton haters." misterhighwasted Jul 2015 #19
I'm really hoping it catches the attention of the admins. sufrommich Jul 2015 #20
We shouldn't have had to wait this long. misterhighwasted Jul 2015 #24
That post is hidden. ????? Lil Missy Jul 2015 #21
No, it stands but a heart-felt two word response to it was hidden. George II Jul 2015 #23
Ah yes, my mistake. n/t Lil Missy Jul 2015 #26
This is wrong. Baitball Blogger Jul 2015 #25
Maybe one of those gutless jurors can explain themselves somewhere BeyondGeography Jul 2015 #28
How could this NOT be banned? mikehiggins Jul 2015 #29
Well, the jurors who voted to LEAVE IT have outed themselves--to the admins, if not to us. MADem Jul 2015 #37
This is the lowest form of behavior EileenFB Jul 2015 #30
Some people just don't want a woman as president bluestateguy Jul 2015 #31
Misogynist attacks are ok against Hillary apparently.... BooScout Jul 2015 #38
Yes, he wasn't hidden OR banned, but if you "tell it like it is" most likely you would. George II Jul 2015 #40
I wonder what has changed? missingthebigdog Jul 2015 #54
I should have done this earlier - here are the detailed results of my alert... George II Jul 2015 #42
thanks for the post. I had riversedge Jul 2015 #49
Unbelievable mcar Jul 2015 #43
Unbelievable that 4 jurors decided to leave that. KMOD Jul 2015 #45
As it was in 2008. Dawson Leery Jul 2015 #52
that's disgusting. nt DesertFlower Jul 2015 #53
How is this not equivalent to the vile post by NYC_SKP? This boggles the mind. n/t Tarheel_Dem Jul 2015 #56
Call Hillary Clinton this name is not acceptable Gothmog Jul 2015 #59
I cannot believe that comment and ID still exists. onehandle Jul 2015 #60
Weelcome to the new DU. William769 Jul 2015 #64
Glad to report that troll has been banned. cyberswede Jul 2015 #65
great news- bravo to Skinner OKNancy Jul 2015 #66
Birds of a feather flock together. William769 Jul 2015 #67
Everyone who replied to that vile post condemned it. cyberswede Jul 2015 #68
Like I said, birds of a feather flock together. William769 Jul 2015 #70
There was an OP defending it BainsBane Jul 2015 #71
BINGO! William769 Jul 2015 #72
In fact, I just saw a second OP defending it BainsBane Jul 2015 #73
Good news mcar Jul 2015 #69
Excellent news. Starry Messenger Jul 2015 #74
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»It's now acceptable to re...»Reply #27