A question for the HRC group

[ismnotwasm]

31. The first non-starter is the speech transcripts

The fact that even on the list negates any validity it might otherwise have.

The second is the "return" of campaign contributions--it implies Hillary has done something wrong or illegal, and she has not. I call bullshit.

The Citizens United one evolved from annoying woo, as it came into being as an attack against Hillary, and Hillary already supports repeal.

Most of the rest of the list is coached in the same way, an ultimatum and the implications that Hillary is corrupt.
Gun reform goes without saying for any candidate.

I am fine with Hillary's minimum wage plan.

People appeantly have zero clues about what Glass-Steagall did, as well as what it did and did not prevent. A kind of rallying cry for the economically ignorant, but fine--improve it and bring it back.

Actual conversations could be had about healthcare--do we want to evolve into single payer or universal healthcare? CO2 emissions, war, fracking--although those conversations need to take into account all the factors, and each conversation should be independent of the other--in general I see a laundry list of asinine criticisms of Hillary, almost all conspiracy theory based. I've quit paying attention
When I see a list of requirements, my first response is to roll my eyes, but I do appreciate what you are trying to do