Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

TwilightZone

(25,457 posts)

7. "We'll figure it out later" isn't a terribly convincing argument, as they noted.

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 03:00 PM

May 2016

Particularly when breaking up the banks was a centerpiece of his campaign from the start.

I find it kind of remarkable that he wouldn't be ready for that question from day one.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders bank plans too vague to succeed [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2016 OP

But he was correct RickHworth May 2016 #1

Nah, BS wasn't correct.. he needed to do his homework and now it's too late. Cha May 2016 #2

Correct on what? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2016 #3

This is the Clinton Group shenmue May 2016 #4

His opponent's position is that we need the big banks, strange as it may seem jmowreader May 2016 #10

ALL of Sanders' plans were too vague calguy May 2016 #5

Sanders doesn't even understand the basic issue. stopbush May 2016 #6

"We'll figure it out later" isn't a terribly convincing argument, as they noted. TwilightZone May 2016 #7

Repeating talking points may rev up crowd but it's not a plan SharonClark May 2016 #8

Reminds me of the grumpy old man yelling at the kids on the street to get off his property. fleabiscuit May 2016 #9