Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

LiberalFighter

(53,544 posts)

8. At best they could eliminate caucuses.

Reply to Lord Magus (Reply #7)

Thu May 26, 2016, 05:43 AM

May 2016

But then there would be the issue of some states that don't have a primary until later in the year. Either too close to the national convention or even after with not enough time to hold their own state convention for the purpose of electing other national delegates.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rachel talking about Sanders' loss in the Washington Primary [View all] SharonClark May 2016 OP

I agree UMTerp01 May 2016 #1

The WA primary was a flimsy consolation prize for folks who can't caucus bluestateguy May 2016 #2

There isn't really much that the DNC can do about it. They can encourage Washington to change it. LiberalFighter May 2016 #3

I'm pretty sure the DNC actually can mandate it. Lord Magus May 2016 #7

At best they could eliminate caucuses. LiberalFighter May 2016 #8

Poor Bernie. The will of the people is to send you home without even... Walk away May 2016 #4

Yeah, that's exactly what we've been saying about the Super Ds! Cha May 2016 #5

Well, yeah... Surya Gayatri May 2016 #6

Actually, 230,000 (still low) attended the caucuses. LisaM May 2016 #9

So we really are the silent Majority! Her Sister May 2016 #10