Hillary Clinton

DURHAM D

(32,949 posts)

11. Given that she was no longer an employee of the federal

Sun May 29, 2016, 09:20 PM

May 2016

government and there is the FBI investigation of god knows what that is on going I feel certain that her attorneys would have advised her not to talk to the OIG. One rational reporter on my tv made this comment but most talk shit because they don't have a clue what they are actually talking about. I heard one interview last week where the reporter asked her a question about two things unrelated but he thought they were. He needn't know the terms of art, and I watched as Hillary tried to answer without going into a 1/2 hour explanation or just straight up insulting the idiot. otoh - I don't think a 1/2 hour explanation would of gotten the job done...she would have needed hand puppets, a felt board, and a dry erase board.

Also, it was well known that the OIG guy in charge was biased. He might have been associated with Senator Grassley, can't remember for sure.

I recall something about the early e-mails but that 30,000 is not a number I have heard before. Also, how would anyone know the number if they have vanished. Sounds made up.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Request for input from Hillary Group (HCG) [View all] LAS14 May 2016 OP

emails and stuff stonecutter357 May 2016 #1

Sorry, I don't understand this. Could you elaborate? LAS14 May 2016 #2

Could you elaborate? it's a RWNJ junk ,is that good enough. stonecutter357 May 2016 #6

No. It seems to me that my post is totally pro-Hillary. LAS14 May 2016 #7

Please also suggest titles for the OP. LAS14 May 2016 #3

This OKNancy's OP's linked article is pretty good on the subject of Clinton's emails Her Sister May 2016 #4

Yes, I've included the Newsweek link.. LAS14 May 2016 #9

This is SO GOOD that I've put it in ... LAS14 May 2016 #24

Hello LAS14 SharonClark May 2016 #5

This is why I want to post in GDP. LAS14 May 2016 #8

Could you link to your husband's story? Her Sister May 2016 #13

Here it is. LAS14 May 2016 #15

Loooooooooooooved it! Her Sister May 2016 #19

This is the amazing woman who will make a "Hill" of a President. Great profile. Surya Gayatri May 2016 #21

Thanks for posting that! SharonClark May 2016 #28

"Trying to get excited about Hillary" Sparkly May 2016 #20

Thanks. I'll find her post and send this as a reply. LAS14 May 2016 #22

Check this to see if it gets a response. LAS14 May 2016 #23

One has to wonder how many more of these emails exist. Historic NY May 2016 #10

Given that she was no longer an employee of the federal DURHAM D May 2016 #11

Thanks. You reminded me that I want... LAS14 May 2016 #16

There's a couple of things that seem to be lost in the email controversy radical noodle May 2016 #12

Thanks. Do you have the source for... LAS14 May 2016 #17

Here are a couple radical noodle May 2016 #25

Various responses. LAS14 May 2016 #27

The newsweek article answered your last question. Her Sister May 2016 #14

More sites Sparkly May 2016 #18

I understand you're concerned obamanut2012 May 2016 #26

I posted it. Thanks for all your help. LAS14 May 2016 #29

I just hope Coolest Ranger May 2016 #30

Oh, they will. But that doesn't bother me except... LAS14 May 2016 #31

I trashed GDP so it's content is meaningless to me but... Walk away May 2016 #32

Lots of views, but only 18 direct replies. A number... LAS14 May 2016 #33