Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

radical noodle

(10,433 posts)
25. Here are a couple
Mon May 30, 2016, 10:17 AM
May 2016

But you may have already seen them

I know I've seen that more than once but can't remember where. I'll look for it.

It would seem to me that if Blumenthal had classified information he sent to her on email it would be the fault of whoever gave him that information in the first place, and it wasn't Hillary. Why DID he have classified information to send to her? I'm not entirely sure how that happened, or if it was classified later.

I assume you've seen this?
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/factsheets/2015/07/13/email-facts/

A portion of this article deals with classified information in a separate system:
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-prez-clinton-emails-q-and-a-html-htmlstory.html

Technically, messages from the classified system cannot be sent electronically to unsecured accounts. But it would be possible for someone to hear classified information in a secure briefing and type that into an email on an unsecured account. It is also possible for an official to obtain information from nonclassified sources that the government considers classified – a situation that security experts refer to as "parallel reporting."

(There is also a small portion of this article that refers to the Blumenthal issue.)

This is such a complicated subject and nothing will convince those who hate her anyway, but the emails are going through various departments and each has things they don't want in the public domain, so they mark them "classified" to keep places like Judicial Watch from getting them. That's hardly the fault of Hillary Clinton, though.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

emails and stuff stonecutter357 May 2016 #1
Sorry, I don't understand this. Could you elaborate? LAS14 May 2016 #2
Could you elaborate? it's a RWNJ junk ,is that good enough. stonecutter357 May 2016 #6
No. It seems to me that my post is totally pro-Hillary. LAS14 May 2016 #7
Please also suggest titles for the OP. LAS14 May 2016 #3
This OKNancy's OP's linked article is pretty good on the subject of Clinton's emails Her Sister May 2016 #4
Yes, I've included the Newsweek link.. LAS14 May 2016 #9
This is SO GOOD that I've put it in ... LAS14 May 2016 #24
Hello LAS14 SharonClark May 2016 #5
This is why I want to post in GDP. LAS14 May 2016 #8
Could you link to your husband's story? Her Sister May 2016 #13
Here it is. LAS14 May 2016 #15
Loooooooooooooved it! Her Sister May 2016 #19
This is the amazing woman who will make a "Hill" of a President. Great profile. Surya Gayatri May 2016 #21
Thanks for posting that! SharonClark May 2016 #28
"Trying to get excited about Hillary" Sparkly May 2016 #20
Thanks. I'll find her post and send this as a reply. LAS14 May 2016 #22
Check this to see if it gets a response. LAS14 May 2016 #23
One has to wonder how many more of these emails exist. Historic NY May 2016 #10
Given that she was no longer an employee of the federal DURHAM D May 2016 #11
Thanks. You reminded me that I want... LAS14 May 2016 #16
There's a couple of things that seem to be lost in the email controversy radical noodle May 2016 #12
Thanks. Do you have the source for... LAS14 May 2016 #17
Here are a couple radical noodle May 2016 #25
Various responses. LAS14 May 2016 #27
The newsweek article answered your last question. Her Sister May 2016 #14
More sites Sparkly May 2016 #18
I understand you're concerned obamanut2012 May 2016 #26
I posted it. Thanks for all your help. LAS14 May 2016 #29
I just hope Coolest Ranger May 2016 #30
Oh, they will. But that doesn't bother me except... LAS14 May 2016 #31
I trashed GDP so it's content is meaningless to me but... Walk away May 2016 #32
Lots of views, but only 18 direct replies. A number... LAS14 May 2016 #33
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Request for input from Hi...»Reply #25