Hillary Clinton

LAS14

(15,449 posts)

27. Various responses.

Reply to radical noodle (Reply #25)

Mon May 30, 2016, 11:15 AM

May 2016

But you may have already seen them

No, this is the first I've heard of this particular take.

I know I've seen that more than once but can't remember where. I'll look for it.

It would seem to me that if Blumenthal had classified information he sent to her on email it would be the fault of whoever gave him that information in the first place, and it wasn't Hillary. Why DID he have classified information to send to her? I'm not entirely sure how that happened, or if it was classified later.

I totally agree that it means nothing of a classified e-mail was sent to her. And that was the case. I remember her mentioning it in a debate and am going to try to find her direct quote. This photo of one of the 4 in question is confusing to me, but "classified" is in the middle. It was not originated by Hillary.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/16223

but the emails are going through various departments and each has things they don't want in the public domain, so they mark them "classified" to keep places like Judicial Watch from getting them. That's hardly the fault of Hillary Clinton, though.

I do point out that they were marked classified after the fact, but I think I'll add this bit about different departments with different standards.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Request for input from Hillary Group (HCG) [View all] LAS14 May 2016 OP

emails and stuff stonecutter357 May 2016 #1

Sorry, I don't understand this. Could you elaborate? LAS14 May 2016 #2

Could you elaborate? it's a RWNJ junk ,is that good enough. stonecutter357 May 2016 #6

No. It seems to me that my post is totally pro-Hillary. LAS14 May 2016 #7

Please also suggest titles for the OP. LAS14 May 2016 #3

This OKNancy's OP's linked article is pretty good on the subject of Clinton's emails Her Sister May 2016 #4

Yes, I've included the Newsweek link.. LAS14 May 2016 #9

This is SO GOOD that I've put it in ... LAS14 May 2016 #24

Hello LAS14 SharonClark May 2016 #5

This is why I want to post in GDP. LAS14 May 2016 #8

Could you link to your husband's story? Her Sister May 2016 #13

Here it is. LAS14 May 2016 #15

Loooooooooooooved it! Her Sister May 2016 #19

This is the amazing woman who will make a "Hill" of a President. Great profile. Surya Gayatri May 2016 #21

Thanks for posting that! SharonClark May 2016 #28

"Trying to get excited about Hillary" Sparkly May 2016 #20

Thanks. I'll find her post and send this as a reply. LAS14 May 2016 #22

Check this to see if it gets a response. LAS14 May 2016 #23

One has to wonder how many more of these emails exist. Historic NY May 2016 #10

Given that she was no longer an employee of the federal DURHAM D May 2016 #11

Thanks. You reminded me that I want... LAS14 May 2016 #16

There's a couple of things that seem to be lost in the email controversy radical noodle May 2016 #12

Thanks. Do you have the source for... LAS14 May 2016 #17

Here are a couple radical noodle May 2016 #25

Various responses. LAS14 May 2016 #27

The newsweek article answered your last question. Her Sister May 2016 #14

More sites Sparkly May 2016 #18

I understand you're concerned obamanut2012 May 2016 #26

I posted it. Thanks for all your help. LAS14 May 2016 #29

I just hope Coolest Ranger May 2016 #30

Oh, they will. But that doesn't bother me except... LAS14 May 2016 #31

I trashed GDP so it's content is meaningless to me but... Walk away May 2016 #32

Lots of views, but only 18 direct replies. A number... LAS14 May 2016 #33