The ACA is a modest regulation of the existing for-profit insurance industry that's proving to be a godsend to some and a burden to others.
Insured, but Not Covered
Ms. Pineman, who is self-employed, accepted that shed have to pay higher premiums for a plan with a narrower provider network and no out-of-network coverage. She accepted that shed have to pay out of pocket to see her primary care physician, who didnt participate. She even accepted having co-pays of nearly $1,800 to have a cast put on her ankle in an emergency room after she broke it while playing tennis.
But her frustration bubbled over when she tried to arrange a follow-up visit with an orthopedist in her Empire Blue Cross/Blue Shield network: The nearest doctor available who treated ankle problems was in Stamford, Conn. When she called to protest, her insurer said that Stamford was 14 miles from her home and 15 was considered a reasonable travel distance. It was ridiculous didnt they notice it was in another state? said Ms. Pineman, 46, who was on crutches.
She instead paid $350 to see a nearby orthopedist and bought a boot on Amazon as he suggested. She has since forked over hundreds of dollars more for a physical therapist that insurance didnt cover, even though that provider was in-network.
The Affordable Care Act has ushered in an era of complex new health insurance products featuring legions of out-of-pocket coinsurance fees, high deductibles and narrow provider networks. Though commercial insurers had already begun to shift toward such policies, the health care law gave them added legitimacy and has vastly accelerated the trend, experts say.
It is true that the Affordable Care Act has erased some of the more egregious practices of the American health insurance system that left patients bankrupt or losing homes to pay bills. Insurers can no longer deny coverage to those with pre-existing conditions, for example. And the new policies cap out-of-pocket spending so long as the patient receives care within the plan. Most important, the act has offered health insurance to an estimated 10 million Americans who did not have any, often by expanding Medicaid or providing subsidies.
But by endorsing and expanding the complex new policies promoted by the health care industry, the law may in some ways be undermining its signature promise: health care that is accessible and affordable for all.
If the vision of the Democratic Party is to fight over keeping the merger reforms of the ACA which lead to very uneven outcomes and benefits, then we're toast. It was designed as a third-way politics lifeline to the insurance industry that helped a lot of people, hurt others, and doesn't control cost.
The ACA needs to be the opening salvo in the fight for Medicare for All, not the place where we draw the lines of surrender.