Hillary Clinton

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)

24. I've noticed that same thing. The only coverage Clinton ever gets is negative against her.

Sun Dec 27, 2015, 04:11 PM

Dec 2015

Sanders is a useful tool for U.S. media to bash Clinton some more.

The U.S. media are treating Clinton as they've been treating President Obama - horribly, and with the least positive coverage.

Trump gets all positive coverage (he's strong, outspoken, plainspoken, refuses to be p.c., strongly goes after his opponents or anyone who dares to challenge him with some perceived insult, and crushes them, etc.) while the same talking-heads and pundits word their reporting on Clinton to have it come across negatively, making her look weak and gaffe-prone (two things she's not and has never been).

They used the same tactic against President Obama after his one-day honeymoon after being inaugurated was over (before that, he received huge amounts of positive coverage because they wanted him to defeat Hillary Clinton), and President Obama hasn't been able to catch a break since.

We now see clearly who U.S. media as a whole are against...the People.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WP: Bernie Sanders shares something with Republicans: Bashing the media [View all] Rose Siding Dec 2015 OP

The media have performed shamefully saltpoint Dec 2015 #1

This is the Hillary group OKNancy Dec 2015 #3

The post concerned an attack on saltpoint Dec 2015 #5

Republicans love Bernie Sanders stonecutter357 Dec 2015 #6

I accept the negative assessment of saltpoint Dec 2015 #7

She did. But she doesn't blast them about it in her stump speech Rose Siding Dec 2015 #8

Hillary's blast was at media generally but saltpoint Dec 2015 #9

And, that was in 2008.. Now, it's SOS Hillary after having served in the Obama Admin Cha Dec 2015 #21

I'm really tired of the whining NastyRiffraff Dec 2015 #2

As far as I'm concerned there is too much Bernie OKNancy Dec 2015 #4

Seems the media has been pretty kind to Bernie. SunSeeker Dec 2015 #10

And along with the media, the DNC and DWS, I know there has been bashing of DNC and now Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #11

A suggestion question everything Dec 2015 #12

I agree that we should remain positive about BlueMTexpat Dec 2015 #13

My point was a positive comment on Hillary and I didn't bash BS Rose Siding Dec 2015 #14

Rose, I think your OP was fine. msrizzo Dec 2015 #16

thank you for your post, msrizzo.. well said. I think you're right! Cha Dec 2015 #19

+1 - Very well said Tommy2Tone Dec 2015 #25

Your OP is perfect, Rose.. we're not going to be censored in here, too. Especially Cha Dec 2015 #18

Hi question.. As a Group host, I for one think Rose's OP is perfectly alright. We can point out Cha Dec 2015 #17

Attacking the media is always the last resort of failing candidates and campaigns. eom MohRokTah Dec 2015 #15

Yep. A bad workman will always blame the tools. eom BlueCaliDem Dec 2015 #23

The rwingers are lying when they attack the media for having "a liberal bias".. everyone knows Cha Dec 2015 #20

Sanders supporters don't mention the negativity of Clinton coverage Nomadas Dec 2015 #22

I've noticed that same thing. The only coverage Clinton ever gets is negative against her. BlueCaliDem Dec 2015 #24

My issue with Bernie's media bashing is it's not productive Tommy2Tone Dec 2015 #26