Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
4. That's not my understanding Cha......
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:32 PM
Feb 2016

It appears that the court will continue to decide cases as usual, but for now with only eight justices, until Scalia's replacement is confirmed. The following article confirms this:

Washington (CNN)This Supreme Court term was already set to be a blockbuster and consequential. Justices are considering a major challenge to public sector unions, a race-conscious admissions plan at the University of Texas, the first big abortion case since 2007, challenges to voting rights, the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate and a challenge to President Barack Obama's immigration actions.

Although in some of the cases, the late Justice Antonin Scalia probably indicated to his colleagues in conference which way he was going to vote, those preliminary votes aren't binding and are now void.

Scalia's sudden death over the weekend at a Texas desert resort means the court is facing a new challenge: the loss of its main conservative voice.

"The entire tenor of this term has now changed," said Stephen Vladeck a CNN contributor and a law professor at American University Washington College of Law. "The court can try to go ahead, but on cases where they are split 4-4 , their only options are to leave the lower court decision intact or to hold the case over until Justice Scalia's replacement is confirmed."


Rest of article here: What happens to Supreme Court cases this year?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thank you for this, Cajun. So if the repub Senate doesn't confirm President Obama's Cha Feb 2016 #1
That's not my understanding Cha...... CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #4
Right.. I should have worded it better.. If there's a tie.. it will go to the lower court Cha Feb 2016 #6
Yep, exactly.... CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #13
Wow, you sure know a lot about it.. study much? And, yes very interesting! Cha Feb 2016 #14
Well I am a bit of a politics wonk, and when you write a blog... CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #22
Why is RBG just hanging out, why not retire Maru Kitteh Feb 2016 #12
For the same reason President Obama won't get his nominee to replace Scalia now: BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #17
Those seem like very long dice to throw Maru Kitteh Feb 2016 #20
All things being equal, the Democrats are in an excellent position to retake the Senate CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #21
I have been reading about some great possibilities for a replacement Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #2
agree ;) mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #3
If we get the right Democratic candidate (n/t) CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #5
So true. nt UtahLib Feb 2016 #7
Well, here's an opportunity for one sitting Senator, running for the "Democratic" nomination to... Tarheel_Dem Feb 2016 #8
I'm not going to hold my breath CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #9
10-4 that. eom fleabiscuit Feb 2016 #10
Well, I won't hold mine either since he tends to work against the president as much as the Repukes. Tarheel_Dem Feb 2016 #11
That's right.. let's see that "revolution" in action. Cha Feb 2016 #15
Now that would be "revolutionary". Tarheel_Dem Feb 2016 #19
Let us not forget that Republicans must defend 24 Senate seats, of which 18 are highly BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #16
Already, Republicans are trying to convince people of a lie pandr32 Feb 2016 #18
Scouts blog predicts Loretta Lynch gemlake Feb 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»The Death of Justice Scal...»Reply #4