Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
13. Yep, exactly....
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 11:16 AM
Feb 2016

On a 4-4 vote by the Supreme Court, the decision of the Appellate Court ruling would be allow to stand, but the Supreme Court would not be setting a precedent that other courts must follow. So it will depend on the case and what the Appellate Court which heard the case ruled.

Sometimes, like the climate change case, the progressive side would prevail. However, in others, like in the case of Texas' very tough anti-abortion law which was upheld by the lower courts, conservative opinions would be allow to stand with a 4-4 Supreme Court vote.

However, since a 4-4 Supreme Court vote on the Texas case wouldn't set a precedent, it would only apply for the case heard by the Appellate Court in the 5th Circuit which includes Texas. An identical anti-abortion law in say Arkansas might be struck down totally or in part by the Appellate Court in the 8th Circuit. So at least theoretically Appellate Courts in each of the 11 Circuits could issue completely different rulings in very similar cases and all of those cases would stand until the Supreme Court issues a definitive ruling on the matter.

When there are dissimilar rulings on the same issue of law in the lower courts, the Supreme Court almost always chooses to hear one of the case in order to settle the matter. but a 4 to 4 decision in the Supreme Court wouldn't do that - it would only settle that particular case. So in such situations, the highest court would most likely "kick the can down the road", waiting until a 9th Justice takes his/her place on the Court before taking up the issue.

There is usually consensus among the majority of Supreme Court Justices on most cases they hear so even with eight Justices, those cases will be decided with finality. It the highly ideological cases which have the most chance of being stalemated, but there are at least five major cases of that variety already on the docket for the upcoming session.

Until that ninth Supreme Court Justice takes his/her place on the highest bench and the Supreme Court is no longer powerless in deciding the most important case in the country, it is going to be a very interesting year.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thank you for this, Cajun. So if the repub Senate doesn't confirm President Obama's Cha Feb 2016 #1
That's not my understanding Cha...... CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #4
Right.. I should have worded it better.. If there's a tie.. it will go to the lower court Cha Feb 2016 #6
Yep, exactly.... CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #13
Wow, you sure know a lot about it.. study much? And, yes very interesting! Cha Feb 2016 #14
Well I am a bit of a politics wonk, and when you write a blog... CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #22
Why is RBG just hanging out, why not retire Maru Kitteh Feb 2016 #12
For the same reason President Obama won't get his nominee to replace Scalia now: BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #17
Those seem like very long dice to throw Maru Kitteh Feb 2016 #20
All things being equal, the Democrats are in an excellent position to retake the Senate CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #21
I have been reading about some great possibilities for a replacement Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #2
agree ;) mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #3
If we get the right Democratic candidate (n/t) CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #5
So true. nt UtahLib Feb 2016 #7
Well, here's an opportunity for one sitting Senator, running for the "Democratic" nomination to... Tarheel_Dem Feb 2016 #8
I'm not going to hold my breath CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #9
10-4 that. eom fleabiscuit Feb 2016 #10
Well, I won't hold mine either since he tends to work against the president as much as the Repukes. Tarheel_Dem Feb 2016 #11
That's right.. let's see that "revolution" in action. Cha Feb 2016 #15
Now that would be "revolutionary". Tarheel_Dem Feb 2016 #19
Let us not forget that Republicans must defend 24 Senate seats, of which 18 are highly BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #16
Already, Republicans are trying to convince people of a lie pandr32 Feb 2016 #18
Scouts blog predicts Loretta Lynch gemlake Feb 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»The Death of Justice Scal...»Reply #13