Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Treant

(1,968 posts)
6. A one point comparison is interesting
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 10:23 AM
Feb 2016

but not very indicative of much statistically. I'd be curious to see Dem registered against Dem voting percentages in the primary for several non-incumbent cycles. I'd bet there's an ebb and flow, and in this case, we're in an ebb.

2008 was to replace Bush...who was a rather polarizing figure to the Democrats. And we had Obama, an excellent orator. Of course we showed up in droves.

2016 is a far different case. We're coming off of 8 good years. And most of the people who aren't political wonks are fine with either candidate, so there's nothing drawing them to the polls.

On the Republican side, this is easily the most polarized primary in recent history. You have Trump, the maverick, Rubio, the evangelist, and Cruz, that third one. Of course turnout is quite high.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Dem turnout DOWN in NV--a...»Reply #6