Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Showing Original Post only (View all)Does money matter? Is Bernie broke? [View all]
http://www.dailynewsbin.com/opinion/despite-claims-on-cable-news-bernie-sanders/23987/Bernie Sanders has already spent up his February haul, has a few million dollars left at most
It is factually correct that Bernie Sanders raised around $42 million during the month of February. But that was when most people were under the impression that he was a contender or even a frontrunner, because thats what cable news had spent the past six months inaccurately telling them. Democrats supported Bernie, and donated to him, because they thought he could win. What the pundits on television keep failing to mention is that hes already spent most of his February money on his failed Super Tuesday gambit. And now that the nation can see hes not competitive, there will be far less money coming in.
Heres the real math on how campaigns work: of the $96 million total sum that the FEC says Bernie Sanders had raised prior to February, he had already spent $82 million of it, leaving him just $14 million cash on hand on February 1st. His pattern so far has been to spend most of his money as it comes in, which all campaigns must do when theyre behind and trying to catch up.
And this was back when he only had to lay out advertising dollars in the one early state that would be voting at a time, not eleven Super Tuesday states simultaneously. In an attempt to make a comeback, Bernie ran wall to wall national
Heres the real math on how campaigns work: of the $96 million total sum that the FEC says Bernie Sanders had raised prior to February, he had already spent $82 million of it, leaving him just $14 million cash on hand on February 1st. His pattern so far has been to spend most of his money as it comes in, which all campaigns must do when theyre behind and trying to catch up.
And this was back when he only had to lay out advertising dollars in the one early state that would be voting at a time, not eleven Super Tuesday states simultaneously. In an attempt to make a comeback, Bernie ran wall to wall national
Frankly, I don't understand Bernie's use of dollars. For example, registration for a closed primary was over in Florida weeks ago, and many have already voted by mail. Why run ads here for the first time this last week in an expensive market?
No matter, Bernie appears to have outspent Hillary in several primary markets and it didn't help him on Super Tuesday. The next few weeks are more expensive, and he is further behind in the polls. Bernie has not faced attack ads of any consequence yet. His effort appears to be in trouble now. Out of money, behind on everything (polls, endorsements), and no way to get traction outside of a few rural, mid-western states.
20 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I never believed that Progressives donated that much to Sanders, either, and since the GOP funded
BlueCaliDem
Mar 2016
#14
After the primaries began and the candidate is not big in the winning column
Thinkingabout
Mar 2016
#7
Now that's what I call "Berning" through cash. But hey, it ain't my money to "bern".
Tarheel_Dem
Mar 2016
#19