Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MarianJack

(10,237 posts)
11. In 2012 the Maine Republican/teabagger caucuses were a DISASTER!
Sat Mar 5, 2016, 12:51 PM
Mar 2016

Most of this because Charley Webster, their state chair at the time, was DETERMINED to have Willard win, even though an apparent majority (or pluality) supported someone else. If I recall, little Ricky Santorum's supporters moved to Ron Paul or the other way around. Webster would have NONE of anybody but Willard winning, by hook or by (typical of the R/ts) crook. Maine Republicans/teabaggers looked foolish coast to coast, which is pretty easy for them to do in this era of Paul LePage.

PEACE!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K & R SunSeeker Mar 2016 #1
K&R! stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #2
A look back at Super Tuesday. yallerdawg Mar 2016 #3
+1 Chichiri Mar 2016 #9
Good morning from Winthrop, Maine! MarianJack Mar 2016 #4
Some info on the Maine caucuses Zing Zing Zingbah Mar 2016 #5
Interesting info. Thanks for posting this. livetohike Mar 2016 #6
In 2012 the Maine Republican/teabagger caucuses were a DISASTER! MarianJack Mar 2016 #11
Thanks for this! Glad you are feeling a little livetohike Mar 2016 #7
"Clinton needs 46.8% of remaining pledged delegates." --- That seems doable! :-D NurseJackie Mar 2016 #8
K&R UtahLib Mar 2016 #10
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»STATE OF THE PRIMARY - Ma...»Reply #11