Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

Showing Original Post only (View all)

robbedvoter

(28,290 posts)
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 12:31 PM Mar 2016

Why Sam Wang is not covering D primaries anymore [View all]

I've been looking forward to his forecasts as his reputation is even more sterling than Nate Silvers. But he's been doing 🐘 only. Yesterday, in a foot note, I finally discovered why http://election.princeton.edu/2016/03/05/more-of-the-same/
http://election.princeton.edu/2016/03/05/more-of-the-same/

* I’m not going to write about Democrats. If we use the majority of pledged delegates as a criterion, the paint became dry as of South Carolina/Nevada. If one includes superdelegates in the count, Hillary Clinton started above the 50% criterion even before Iowa/New Hampshire and has not dipped below.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sam Wang relies on reality. SunSeeker Mar 2016 #1
Yep . . . and K & R this Iliyah Mar 2016 #2
K&R livetohike Mar 2016 #3
Primaries end March 15 for DailyKos. yallerdawg Mar 2016 #4
And by March 15, primaries will include large purple states spooky3 Mar 2016 #5
He has been spot on in the past. spooky3 Mar 2016 #6
Oligarch!!!!!!! dlwickham Mar 2016 #7
+1 sometimes the light is dazzeling. Historic NY Mar 2016 #8
Oh! Cha Mar 2016 #9
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Why Sam Wang is not cover...»Reply #0