Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mira

(22,685 posts)
3. The point I am trying to make
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:52 PM
Mar 2016

is that yes, we are a religious country. Yet it is not a Minister / Preacher / Rabbi / or Mullah we are electing.
We don't expect the religious leaders to be able to lead the country, and we don't need our President to be soul searched about his personal God.
It is basically not relevant. All religions along with all caring humans who believe in God or do not, and we probably agree on this, have the same basic interest in the caring for our fellow man.
Do onto others, is a wonderful bottom line answer about religion.
And it is all, in my opinion, that is required. Every thing else seems invasive to me, and none of anybody's business.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»The Faith Question just a...»Reply #3