Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FrenchieCat

(68,868 posts)
4. It will be relevant to many.....in the GE, IMO....
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 12:04 AM
Mar 2016

The right to know IS relevant, when vetting anyone for the highest office in the land,
understanding that the candidate will be running against someone else,
and folks will have a choice. To pretend that it is information that shouldn't be known,
when it will most likely be used against the candidate by the opposition,
is folly in USA 2016...which is not the idealistic 2016 we would want it to be....

I do agree with you though that once one has that information,
thank it becomes nobody's business what they choose to do with that info.

The fact that it is being obscured is not wise electionwise, IMO.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»The Faith Question just a...»Reply #4