Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Showing Original Post only (View all)Joan Walsh gets it right. BS is black or white. No nuances, no compromises. One note campaign. [View all]
In Flint Debate, the Clinton-Sanders Clash Gets RougherTHE NATION
By Joan Walsh
TODAY 7:36 AM
In the meantime, though, what happens to the people who are suffering? Thats where Clinton was strong and Sanders seemed far less engaged.
Take the issue of the 2008 auto bailout, perhaps the thorniest of the debate, on the eve of Tuesdays Michigan primary. The funds, which saved an estimated 1.5 million jobs, were tucked inside the odious Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARPbetter known as the bank bailoutwhich Sanders opposed. So he voted against the double bailout bill.
Sunday night he stood by that vote, though he reminded Clinton and the crowd that hed worked to get Congress to take up the auto bailout on its own. That didnt work out, but Sanders still defended his anti-bailout vote:
If you are talking about the Wall Street bailout, where some of your friends destroyed this economy, when billionaires on Wall Street destroyed this economy, they went to Congress and they said, please, well be good boys, bail us out. You know what I said? I said, let the billionaires themselves bail out Wall Street.
Clintons retort is telling:
The Bush administration negotiated the deal. Were there things in it that I didnt like? Would I have done it differently? Absolutely. But was the auto bailout money in itthe $350 billion that was needed to begin the restructuring of the auto industry? Yes, it was. So when I talk about Senator Sanders being a one-issue candidate, I mean very clearlyyou have to make hard choices when youre in positions of responsibility. The two senators from Michigan stood on the floor and said, we have to get this money released. I went with them, and I went with Barack Obama. You did not. If everybody had voted the way he did, I believe the auto industry would have collapsed, taking four million jobs with it.
That exchange sums up the nightand the entire campaign.
http://www.thenation.com/article/in-flint-debate-the-clinton-sanders-clash-gets-rougher/
Take the issue of the 2008 auto bailout, perhaps the thorniest of the debate, on the eve of Tuesdays Michigan primary. The funds, which saved an estimated 1.5 million jobs, were tucked inside the odious Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARPbetter known as the bank bailoutwhich Sanders opposed. So he voted against the double bailout bill.
Sunday night he stood by that vote, though he reminded Clinton and the crowd that hed worked to get Congress to take up the auto bailout on its own. That didnt work out, but Sanders still defended his anti-bailout vote:
If you are talking about the Wall Street bailout, where some of your friends destroyed this economy, when billionaires on Wall Street destroyed this economy, they went to Congress and they said, please, well be good boys, bail us out. You know what I said? I said, let the billionaires themselves bail out Wall Street.
Clintons retort is telling:
The Bush administration negotiated the deal. Were there things in it that I didnt like? Would I have done it differently? Absolutely. But was the auto bailout money in itthe $350 billion that was needed to begin the restructuring of the auto industry? Yes, it was. So when I talk about Senator Sanders being a one-issue candidate, I mean very clearlyyou have to make hard choices when youre in positions of responsibility. The two senators from Michigan stood on the floor and said, we have to get this money released. I went with them, and I went with Barack Obama. You did not. If everybody had voted the way he did, I believe the auto industry would have collapsed, taking four million jobs with it.
That exchange sums up the nightand the entire campaign.
http://www.thenation.com/article/in-flint-debate-the-clinton-sanders-clash-gets-rougher/
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Joan Walsh gets it right. BS is black or white. No nuances, no compromises. One note campaign. [View all]
Fla Dem
Mar 2016
OP
That was in his self interest and his Vt constituents. Bet if planes were going to another state
Fla Dem
Mar 2016
#33
On the other forum there is one poster in particular whose posts are vehemently anti Clinton.
Bad Dog
Mar 2016
#13
There are PLENTY of Republican rodent-breeders hiding as Bernie supporters. Dollars to donuts,
BlueCaliDem
Mar 2016
#17
Sen. Peters said today that they all talked about how it would help the auto industry. They all
lunamagica
Mar 2016
#52
Whew. Sanders has a kind of binary world view with a one size fits all answer....
Hekate
Mar 2016
#21
First rate article. I think this moment will be looked back on as a pivotal moment.
Stand and Fight
Mar 2016
#27
All you Congress are #establishmentarians! Yeah, how about a Straight answer, bernie?
Cha
Mar 2016
#54
As I understand it, both BS & the pundits were taken completely by surprise. The Clinton campaign..
Tarheel_Dem
Mar 2016
#40