And there ya have it

[spooky3]

11. Jury results - I was juror #1:

On Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:36 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

The DUzy Awards - and the hijacking thereof.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027681281

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This is disruptive meta, and a viscous call-out of Flying Squirrel. Nancy has no copyrights to anything posted on DU by her, her late husband, or anyone else.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:47 PM, and the Jury voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Nance has the right to express herself and remind DUers about the intent behind the awards. She did so politely.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Agree completely with the alerter, this is a nasty call out of a decent poster who is doing nothing wrong.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Loved JeffR and the DUzy awards. They were a weekly treat. Even won a couple. But this is obviously meta, with a call out to boot.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Truly a rarity that I vote to hide, but in addition to the call out, the attempt to take what is now part of DU tradition and dictate its use among members is absurd.