Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

book_worm

(15,951 posts)

2. caucus turnout doesn't compare to primaries

Reply to SCantiGOP (Original post)

Sat Mar 26, 2016, 03:09 PM

Mar 2016

I posted last week that Idaho and Utah combined had just over 95,000 participants while Arizona had over 400,000 in the democratic race. That is one reason why HRC won the total popular vote on Tuesday despite losing two states.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders and turnout [View all] SCantiGOP Mar 2016 OP

Caucus states are much lower turnout...and disenfranchise voters. Lucinda Mar 2016 #1

caucus turnout doesn't compare to primaries book_worm Mar 2016 #2

I Don't Think 120,000 Is Good Turnout otohara Mar 2016 #3

When they talk about the super degates it would seem reasonable the super Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #4