Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edbermac

(15,938 posts)
5. Jury results
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 01:28 PM
Mar 2016

On Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:19 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

wondering if there is connection with this? Australian Labor party
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1107&pid=84293

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Linking to a Republican smear campaign against Bernie based on Project Veritas. This is no different than Benghazi, accusations of criminal activity against one of our candidates don't belong on Democratic Underground.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Mar 28, 2016, 12:25 PM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Fuck this James O'Keefe bullshit.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Project Veritas is a known RW source.

If you can source this from a neutral source, great. Do it, we need honesty in our elections. But pulling from a known RW and anti-liberal source isn't appropriate on a Democratic website.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Jackson’s reply to the FE...»Reply #5