Hillary Clinton
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)Unless they are clearly breaking the TOS or flaming, they have nothing to fear from me being on their Jury. I can be impartial even if I find most of their posts galling.
However, that is not the case with some, I've seen Jurors comment that they will or will not leave a post based on the poster in question or the one who is assumed to be under attack. I wish there was an option for outright lying and distrortion, but that is not in the TOS, and even hiding for RW sources, outrageous ones, is not against the rules.
More things like that go to the Hosts (no mods anymore) and some of them won't hide things that match their ideological bent. At least I've been told that. I have no interest in being involved with that.
I look at the list of Hosts and can tell which way they are likely to go on anything, sad to say. Many things have been locked that don't violate forum SOPs. Things have been getting out of hand here.