Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
16. Ok, I am even more lost...
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 12:32 AM
Apr 2016
it has nothing to do with the superdelegates


Ok, you just blew my mind? They can only try to win over super delegates...there is no other option... Wait let me just get this straight, it seems you are implying that they are talking about if there is a first vote ends in a tie or if they can't hit the magic number even with the super delegates and then it becomes brokered? At which that point they try to talk to delegates that are unbound and get them to swap? I have seen zero proof of that. Can you post a source? Also if this happens I am not sure if the Dems have a good way out. If that occurred no one could claim one side was stealing delegates, it would be the rule of the system "if" that is even the rules for our party.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»what the hell is going on...»Reply #16