Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

stopbush

(24,852 posts)

6. No. In fact the only two things I can think that are wrong with the system are

Reply to jg10003 (Reply #3)

Mon Apr 11, 2016, 12:25 PM

Apr 2016

1. not having all primaries be closed, and

2. allowing DINOSs like Bernie Sanders to run as a Dem. There should be a rule that you must have a minimum of 5 consecutive years leading up to the election announcement year as a member of the Democratic Party to be allowed to run as a D in a D presidential primary. That would mean that you would have needed to be a D from at least 2010-2015 to announce in 2015.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

There are reasons why Wyoming ended in a tie for delegates. [View all] LiberalFighter Apr 2016 OP

That can't be true! Treant Apr 2016 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author jg10003 Apr 2016 #2

"Only 55%": can we all agree that when... jg10003 Apr 2016 #3

Go away. Next time, maybe read the parties rules BEFORE joining the party. LannyDeVaney Apr 2016 #4

No. He signed up, he has to follow the Treant Apr 2016 #5

No. In fact the only two things I can think that are wrong with the system are stopbush Apr 2016 #6

Our system is very flawed. William769 Apr 2016 #7

One of the major reforms we need in the DEMOCRATIC Party is allowing only DEMOCRATS to run.... George II Apr 2016 #8

No! No! and No! LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #9