You do realize that the charges against him were "complicity" because he didn't order the police under his control to attack / disperse the protesters, right? I see no evidence he was behind the Cuban Embassy protests, and while I think it was obviously stupid of him to jump the wall, I saw only good intentions in that act, especially since German Sanchez Otero personally called Capriles to come down there. The fact that he did it tells me he's someone of good character, though at the time bad judgment, he wanted to resolve the problem peacefully. This resulted in a 4 month jail time with charges that were subsequently dropped. It wasn't his fault that the media was basically inciting violence against the Cubans because they were trying to paint a Cuban invasion narrative (the right wing in Venezuela does that to this day). In the end he was absolved of the charge of "complicity."
Chavez claimed that Capriles belonged to "Tradition, Family and, Property," in his youth, as if Capriles had any choice in that matter. Capriles came out and denounced Chavez for digging up family history and attacking him on something so far back as to be irrelevant. Meanwhile the chavistas were playing both angles by saying that Capriles was also a zionist (see: "The Enemy is Zionism," wiped from the government website to which it was posted, but can still be found online), too!
The neoliberals who like Capriles don't understand that his policies would crush the boligarchy since the boligarchs benefit from the central command economy, being that they're the ones who are in charge of getting business done. You take the oil income, you funnel it to rich elites, they get contracts, and the cycle perpetuates. Take them out of the cycle, things change big time.
= new reply since forum marked as read