Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(164,137 posts)
1. More, from the same article:
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 04:08 PM
Jul 2013

Last month, I sat with family members of a dozen people killed by army soldiers and police in Arauca, the oil-producing department near the Venezuelan border. Most of the killings had occurred eight to ten years ago, but their cases are languishing in the criminal justice, with no movement at all. A reform to the military justice system this year increases the chances that these mothers and fathers will never see justice, and their dead children will continue to be stigmatized.

The United States has influenced the doctrine, weapons and operations of the Colombian military for decades, especially since Colombia fought alongside the U.S. in Korea. Washington dramatically escalated its involvement in the war between 1998 and 2002, just as it was generating its worst toll. The terrible synergy produced by the Bush administration’s brutal and cynical use of 9/11 with Colombia’s fatal reaction against failed peace talks created an alliance bent on war and militarization without end, while hypocritically certifying improvements in human rights. As paramilitary groups partially demobilized between 2003 and 2006, some of their perverse practices transferred back to the US-client Colombian Army, which adopted a “body count” strategy that became so mercenary that recruiters were paid to supply hundreds of men who were executed and counted as guerrillas killed in combat.

The authors of Basta Ya! clearly intended it for a Colombian audience. There is only a Spanish version, and comparisons made to show the scale of damage from the war are made to Colombian cities that most non-Colombians are unlikely to know. This could explain, at least in part, why the authors also give little attention to the role of the more than $8 billion in US assistance to the Colombian military and police, multinational corporations that have assisted paramilitary groups, or the international narcotics trade that also has financed much of the armed conflict. The focus is on national actors and relationships, many of them hidden and under-reported.

An accounting of what impact the United States has had on Colombia’s terrible suffering has yet to be made. Washington trumpets the success of its military assistance in Colombia, and is financing the exporting of Colombian military expertise to other nations in Latin America and around the world.

But the Pentagon and State Department are increasingly secretive about just what that assistance consists of. After the Fellowship of Reconciliation published a published a report in 2010 indicating that increased civilian killings were committed by US-aided Colombian Army units, the State Department pointedly classified its list of supported units. Similarly, after School of the Americas Watch began to more effectively use lists of Latin American graduates of the U.S. Army school to show how many had committed atrocities, the Pentagon began to systematically refuse disclosure of those names. With the United States spending $25 billion a year on foreign military and police aid, transparency about what units receive assistance is increasingly important for fiscal reasons, as well as a political and ethical imperative.

As human rights, peace, and solidarity activists work against reflexive US military adventures, the victims of wars where the United States takes part deserve the truth about how the U.S. impacted the conflict. This task of constructing and reconstructing memory will require work not just by projects in the affected countries, like Colombia’s Group for Historical Memory, but by researchers, activists, advocates, legislators, whistleblowers, and ordinary people in the United States as well. It is a necessary prerequisite to the United States’ own transformation.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/07/29-5

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

More, from the same article: Judi Lynn Jul 2013 #1
Can someone please explain what Plan Colombia was(is), and why? leveymg Jul 2013 #2
It was initiated by Bill Clinton. I haven't learned anything re: Kissinger, Judi Lynn Jul 2013 #3
Here's an interesting article about US corporate holdings in Colombia. leveymg Jul 2013 #6
the prediction of increased violence has proved false Bacchus4.0 Jul 2013 #8
Just scanned your article, will read it upon return, late this P.M. Judi Lynn Jul 2013 #11
started by Pres. Pastrana of Colombia and Clinton Bacchus4.0 Jul 2013 #4
Does Colombia act as a regional proxy for U.S. policy vis-a-vis Venezuela, others? leveymg Jul 2013 #5
for Venezuela it can. They typically blame Colombia and the US Bacchus4.0 Jul 2013 #7
Do you think the US has a double-standard re: human rights standards applied to the two countries? leveymg Jul 2013 #9
of course, I think the US has one standard for allies and one for those countries that are not Bacchus4.0 Jul 2013 #10
Relatively speaking, which do you think is the worse human-rights abuser: Colombia or Venez? leveymg Jul 2013 #12
do you mean where more human rights abuses occur, or do you mean by which government? Bacchus4.0 Jul 2013 #13
Given what you just said, why do you post (almost) exclusively about abuses in Venez? leveymg Jul 2013 #14
I just like to rub it in their faces. I never try to hide the abuses and problems in Colombia Bacchus4.0 Jul 2013 #15
Thank you for your candor. leveymg Jul 2013 #16
Indeed, the whole point is to be level. joshcryer Jul 2013 #17
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Enough! Accounting and Re...»Reply #1