Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
4. Anything?
Tue May 15, 2012, 03:56 PM
May 2012

Like backing the "Rebels" in Libya,
and getting the IMF Enforcement Arm (NATO) to help "remove" the main roadblock (Gaddafi) to the IMF plans for
raping Africa?

Despite his dictatorial megalomania,
Gaddafi WAS a committed Pan African (Africa for Africans, NOT Global Corporations),
and regularly undercut the IMFs attempts at Predatory Loans collateralize by Natural resources in under-developed African nations.
Adding insult to injury, Gaddafi used profits from Libyan Oil to undercut the IMF.
Not a shining example of NeoLiberal Economics...

...but ALL that is moot now.
Libya, a country that not so long ago had the highest standard of living in North Africa,
is NOW Wide Open to the IMF, along with all of North Africa.

IMF Recognizes Libya's National Transitional Council, Says Ready to Support its Efforts to Revive the Country's Economy

http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2011/pr11329.htm


Despite a UN resolution scrapping sanctions following the death of ousted leader Muammar Gaddafi, the process of unfreezing Libyan assets is lengthy because the money is spread out across many countries with different regulations.

"The promises have been made for the media," Elkaber said.

A NEW BANKING MODEL

He said he hoped the influence of international organizations would help shape a new Libyan model of banking, and the groundwork had already been laid by IMF and World Bank over the previous 2-3 years. (!!!!!)

"The IMF and WB have a roadmap and I would like to go ahead with the facelift. We need a strong central bank," he said.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/03/us-libya-cbank-idUSTRE7A22K420111103



Prior to NATO joining the ongoing Civil War in Libya on the side of "The Rebels",
"Libya was not in debt to international bankers. It did not borrow cash from the International Monetary Fund for any "structural adjustment". It used oil money for social services - including the Great Man Made River project, and investment/aid to sub-Saharan countries. Its independent central bank was not manipulated by the Western financial system. All in all a very bad example for the developing world.”

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MD27Ak01.html



...and NOW we know the REAL reason for the US "Intervention" in Libya.
The Disaster Capitalists piggy-backed on the legitimate Arab Spring Uprisings to join an ongoing Civil War in Libya,
taking sides with "The Rebels" in Tripoli that had admitted ties to Al Qaeda,
but none of that is important when the 1% sees an opportunity to Cash In on Human Misery & Death.


You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»In South America, Separat...»Reply #4