Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

forest444

(5,902 posts)
5. Sure. And besides the corruption, a country's GDP structure should also be considered.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:35 PM
Dec 2015

Last edited Sat Dec 19, 2015, 07:29 PM - Edit history (1)

In the case of Equatorial Guinea, for example, fully 89% of its GDP is simply oil. Crude, unrefined oil. Private consumption (persons and businesses) is merely 17% of GDP. This, of course, is not the global norm.

In Argentina's case, 65% of GDP is private consumption; 17% fixed investment (construction, machinery, and technology). That's more like what you see in a typical developed or semi-developed economy.

Distribution should also be considered: in Argentina, 60% of the population is in the middle or upper class (Pew Research). But because most of Equatorial Guinea's GDP is oil income that goes anywhere except its people, 77% are poor according to their own poverty line definition. Same per capita GDP, in theory; vastly different outcomes

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Macri's devaluation could...»Reply #5