Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
8. NO. We didn't give him unlimited powers--"Manuro" can APPROPRIATE. He can spend the nation's
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 03:15 PM
Jan 2016

cash. Dumbya couldn't do that.

He needed a complicit Congress to vote in favor of authorizations to process his dreams. His demands would have faltered without the cash to fuel them, and Congress voted, year after year, to fund his wishes.

Without those votes and that dough, though, Dumbya would have been HAMSTRUNG.

"Manuro" not only has his hands on the tiller unilaterally, he also has both paws in the till.

It's not the same thing at all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Venezuela's Maduro admits...»Reply #8