Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latin America

flamingdem

(40,835 posts)

6. Really this is something the whole country and the diaspora (!) can be proud of

Reply to Judi Lynn (Reply #5)

Sun Aug 19, 2012, 07:20 PM

Aug 2012

The real numbers are so helpful to get past distortions. Thanks for the translation! This is really their gift to the world and I'm guessing they are implementing these ideas in many other countries.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

UNICEF confirms that Cuba only Latin American country w/o infant malnutrition (nowhere in English) [View all] flamingdem Aug 2012 OP

go to article and right click. there is a translation to English riverbendviewgal Aug 2012 #1

Not sure that is true. Had a hairdresser who efhmc Aug 2012 #2

Most of the population depended upon seasonal work, and had NO income otherwise, Judi Lynn Aug 2012 #4

We can't erase their history - it's the only way to understand the situation flamingdem Aug 2012 #7

Interesting! Never have heard the possible motive. Judi Lynn Aug 2012 #9

Not disputing the past, talking about now. efhmc Aug 2012 #8

This gives the United States Something to Aspire to Demeter Aug 2012 #3

Google translation of the article: Judi Lynn Aug 2012 #5

Really this is something the whole country and the diaspora (!) can be proud of flamingdem Aug 2012 #6

You do realize that Chile was ahead of Cuba in that report, right? joshcryer Aug 2012 #11

I see plenty of English language reports for this, going back to 2010. joshcryer Aug 2012 #10

Yes I think that was purposefully pushed on the web, they left the year off flamingdem Aug 2012 #12

The OP article is actually from 2008. ;) joshcryer Aug 2012 #13

High quality sex Ed and roody Aug 2012 #14