Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)
10. I see plenty of English language reports for this, going back to 2010.
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 12:04 AM
Aug 2012

It comes from here: http://www.unicef.org/progressforchildren/

English version is here: http://www.unicef.org/progressforchildren/2006n4/index.html

You'll note, it's en Español here: http://www.unicef.org/spanish/progressforchildren/2006n4/

Look at the title of the page "Progreso para la Infancia un Balance sobre la Nutrición."

So, not only is this report 6 years old, it doesn't actually say what is being portrayed by English sites like Pravda English or Gramna English.

It says that Cuba was, in 2006, on track.

There is no new data being reflected by this report (which itself is a year old on top of the 2 year old Pravda article), it's just extrapolating.

Cute though. Shows how propaganda is used.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»UNICEF confirms that Cuba...»Reply #10